Sem V Land laws including Tenure and Tenancy System

 Statutes in Course:
1. MP Land Revenue Code, 1959 (Amendment Act 2019)
2. The Ceilings on Agricultural Holdings
3. MP Accomodation Control Act, 1961

Old Syllabus

Unit – I Concept

  1. Objects and Reasons and Basic features of enacting Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code and 1959 and M.P.L.R.C. (Amendment) Act 2019

Objects and Reasons & Basic Features of the M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 and MP LRC (Amendment) Act, 2019

(WITH SECTIONS + CASE LAWS + STORY-BASED INTRODUCTION)


1. INTRODUCTION (Very Detailed + Illustration)

Land has historically been the foundation of economic livelihood, social dignity and political power in Madhya Pradesh. Before independence and even several years thereafter, the territory now known as Madhya Pradesh was not a single administrative unit; it consisted of diverse regions such as the Central Provinces and Berar, Bhopal State, Vindhya Pradesh and Madhya Bharat. Each of these regions had its own land revenue system, its own land-related laws, its own tenure structures, and its own methods of survey, settlement, and assessment. There was no uniformity in the meaning of “tenant”, “landholder”, “rent”, “revenue year”, “abadi”, or even “government land”.

Illustration / Story:
Imagine a cultivator named Gopal in 1955. His ancestral land lies partly in the former Central Provinces region and partly in the former Bhopal State region. When he wants to mutate a small portion of his land after his father’s death, he is shocked to learn that:

  • Mutation procedure in one district is governed by C.P. Land Revenue Act,

  • While in the adjoining district it is governed by Bhopal Land Revenue Code,

  • Survey maps use different numbering methods,

  • Rent assessment follows different timelines,

  • Appeals go to different appellate authorities.

The same family, the same land, but two conflicting systems.
To eliminate this pervasive administrative chaos, achieve uniformity, and modernize land administration, the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 was enacted as a single, comprehensive, and self-contained legislation.

The Preamble and Objects & Reasons clearly show that the intention was to create a harmonised, consolidated and modern land revenue system. Later, to adapt to technological advancements, facilitate digital land records, strengthen tribal protections, and update legal terminology, the MP LRC (Amendment) Act, 2019 was introduced.

Thus, the Code is not merely a revenue statute; it is the constitutional backbone of land administration in the State of Madhya Pradesh.


2. MEANING & NATURE OF THE CODE (Highly Verbose)

The Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, as provided under Section 1, is a unified and exhaustive law governing all matters related to:

  • Land revenue assessment and collection,

  • Survey, re-survey and settlement operations,

  • Tenure rights and classification of landholders,

  • Preparation and maintenance of land records,

  • Powers and duties of Revenue Officers,

  • Appeals, revisions, and reviews within the revenue hierarchy.

It consolidates all previously scattered laws and brings them under one statutory umbrella, ensuring uniformity across the State. The Code creates a complete administrative hierarchy, lays down clear substantive rights, and prescribes procedural safeguards, thereby ensuring fairness and efficiency.

The 2019 Amendment Act updates and strengthens many provisions, especially the definitions under Section 2, procedural rules relating to land records under Sections 109–134, and protection of tribal land under Sections 170–170B.


3. STATUTORY FOUNDATION (Detailed Section-wise Overview)

The Code derives legislative authority primarily from the State List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution:

  • Entry 18 – Land,

  • Entry 45 – Land Revenue,

  • Entry 5 – Local Government and Land Administration.

The Code is divided into several functional chapters:

Section 1 – Short Title, Extent & Commencement

Section 2 – Definitions

Sections 3–10 – Hierarchy of Revenue Officers & Board of Revenue

Sections 11–23 – Powers, Appointment & Duties of Revenue Officers

Sections 57–82 – Land & Land Revenue

Sections 84–110 – Survey, Boundaries & Settlement

Sections 109–134 – Land Records (Khasra, Khatauni, ROR, Field Maps)

Sections 157–168 – Tenure-holders (Bhumiswami, etc.)

Sections 170–176 – Tribal Land Transfers

Sections 41, 50, 51 – Appeal, Revision & Review

Amendment Act, 2019 – Modernisation, Digital Records, Updated Definitions


4. OBJECTS & REASONS OF MP LRC, 1959 (Highly Elaborated)

The Statement of Objects & Reasons reveals the following major objectives:


I. Unification of Diverse Land Laws (Core Objective)

Before 1959, multiple laws governed land administration. The Code unified all these into one.
This is reflected in Section 1, which makes the Code applicable to the entire State.


II. Simplification of Revenue Machinery (Sections 3–23)

The aim was to create a clear, simple, and hierarchical structure of Revenue Officers, such as:

  • Board of Revenue (Section 7)

  • Commissioners (Section 11)

  • Collectors (Section 13)

  • Sub-Divisional Officers (Section 17)

  • Tehsildars (Section 19)

  • Naib-Tehsildars (Section 20)


III. Protection of Landholders and Agriculturists

A major purpose was to protect:

  • Bhumiswamis (Section 158)

  • Occupancy tenants (Section 169)

  • Tribal communities (Section 170–170B)


IV. Scientific Survey & Accurate Land Records (Sections 84–110 & 109–134)

The Code introduced:

  • Mandatory survey, re-survey, and boundary marks

  • Accurate field maps

  • Correction of maps and boundary disputes

  • Scientific land classification


V. Uniform Land Revenue Assessment (Sections 57–82)

The Code sought to ensure fair, reasonable and scientifically based assessment of land revenue.


VI. Providing Effective Remedies (Sections 41, 50, 51)

To ensure justice within the revenue system:

  • Appeals (Section 41)

  • Revision (Section 50)

  • Review (Section 51)


VII. Better Tribal Protection (Section 170)

Land belonging to Scheduled Tribes is protected; transfers require prior permission.


VIII. Bringing Administrative Certainty and Efficiency

Uniform forms, uniform documents, uniform procedures.


5. BASIC FEATURES OF THE MP LRC, 1959 (Very Detailed)


1. Comprehensive and Self-Contained Code

The Code contains substantive, procedural, and administrative rules, eliminating the need to refer to multiple enactments.


2. Hierarchy of Revenue Officers (Sections 3–23)

A structured system ensures accountability and administrative discipline.


3. Concept of “Bhumiswami” (Section 158)

The Code introduces the concept of Bhumiswami, possessing permanent, heritable and transferable rights.


4. Scientific Survey & Settlement (Sections 84–110)

The Code lays down elaborate plans for survey, classification of land, and preparation of maps.


5. Land Records (Sections 109–134)

Requirements include:

  • Khasra (Section 109)

  • Khatauni (Section 110)

  • Field map (Section 111)

  • Record of Rights (Section 114)

  • Mutation procedures


6. Revenue Assessment (Sections 57–82)

Assessment, re-assessment, suspension and remission of land revenue.


7. Protection of Tribal Land (Sections 170, 170A, 170B)

Invalid transfers are voidable; restoration possible.


8. Strong Appellate Structure (Sections 41, 50, 51)

Ensures justice, prevents arbitrary orders.


6. MP LRC (Amendment) Act, 2019 — Key Features


I. Updated Definitions (Section 2 Amendments)

Many terms clarified for modern land use:

  • Orchard

  • Mango grove

  • Plot number

  • Land records


II. Digitisation of Land Records

Online mutation, GIS mapping, digital signatures on Khasra entries.


III. Strengthening of Tribal Protections (Section 170B)

Invalid tribal land transfers can be inquired into by the Collector and reversed.


IV. Modernisation of Procedures

Electronic notices, online mutation, e-governance.


7. IMPORTANT CASE LAWS (Highly Verbose)


1. State of M.P. v. Ranojirao Shinde, AIR 1968 SC 1053

Facts: Challenge raised regarding validity of State’s land reform legislation.
Judgment: Supreme Court upheld that States have full power under Entry 18 & 45 to enact land reform and land revenue laws including MP LRC.
Significance: Provides constitutional legitimacy to MP LRC.


2. Kedar Lal v. Hari Lal, AIR 1952 SC 47

Facts: Conflict over reliability of land record entries in a revenue dispute.
Judgment: Revenue entries have presumptive but not conclusive value.
Significance: Basis for the land records chapter (Sections 109–134).


3. Narmada Bachao Andolan v. State of M.P., (2011) 7 SCC 639

Held that State’s control over land records, rehabilitation, and acquisition is supreme.
Supports legislative intent behind Sections 57–82 and 109–134.


8. OBJECTIVES / RATIONALE 

  • To unify the land administration system

  • To prevent illegal dispossession and protect agriculturists

  • To create clarity of land rights

  • To avoid multiplicity of litigation

  • To protect tribal communities

  • To modernize the revenue record system

  • To create a stable foundation for land development


9. LIMITATIONS (Verbose)

  • Heavy dependence on Revenue Officers

  • Delays in mutation and appeal processes

  • Incomplete digital adoption in remote districts

  • Survey accuracy still improving


10. CONCLUSION

The MP LRC, 1959 is the most important land statute of Madhya Pradesh, bringing unity, order and fairness to land administration. The 2019 Amendment modernizes the Code to suit digital governance and tribal protection. Thus, the Code continues to evolve with constitutional principles and administrative needs.


  1. Definitions: Abadi, Agriculture, Agriculture and Revenue years, Board, Bonafide Agriculturist, Co-operative Society, Government Forest, Government Lessee, Holding, Improvement, Land, Landless Person, Land Records, Mango grove, Orchard, Plot number, Rents, Revenue Officer.

● 1. Abadi – Section 2(1)

Abadi refers to the portion of a village which is permanently set aside for habitation, including houses, courtyards, by-lanes, village streets, cattle sheds, community wells, burial grounds, grazing spots within the habitation, chaupals, and any other area used commonly by villagers for residential or community purposes. It represents the settlement part of the village.
Illustration inside the explanation:
When a villager like Laxman builds a house near the central chowk, that portion is automatically recorded by the Patwari as abadi in the Khasra under Section 109. If later a boundary dispute arises, the Tehsildar refers to the Abadi entry to determine whether the construction falls within village habitation or encroaches on agricultural land.
Additional Example:
If Rukmini constructs a cattle shed on land historically used as a residential street, the SDO may classify the land as abadi irrespective of cultivation status, because usage determines classification.


● 2. Agriculture – Section 2(3)

Agriculture includes all activities connected with crop cultivation, horticulture, orchards, dairy farming, poultry, sericulture, pisciculture, vegetable farming, and operations requiring human labour and skill on land. It also extends to activities preparing land for sowing, irrigating, manuring, harvesting, and maintaining plantations.
Illustration inside the explanation:
If Shyamlal engages in horticultural work by planting orange trees on his land, the activity falls squarely under agriculture. Even if he temporarily uses land for dairy or poultry, it is considered agricultural use under Section 2(3).
Additional Example:
A farmer using a tube-well to irrigate his field, then planting soybean, is performing an agricultural activity; hence diversion permission under Section 172 is not required.


● 3. Agricultural Year – Section 2(4)

The agricultural year extends from 1 July to 30 June, aligning with the monsoon-based cropping cycle in Madhya Pradesh. All crop entries, Kharif and Rabi seasons, crop-cutting experiments, and compensation for crop damage are recorded within this statutory period.
Illustration inside explanation:
If Badri sows soybean in July 2024 and harvests in October 2024, the Patwari enters both activities within the same agricultural year 2024–25.
Additional Example:
When hail damage occurs in February, compensation under disaster relief schemes is calculated with reference to the agricultural year entries.


● 4. Revenue Year – Section 2(20)

Revenue year also runs from 1 July to 30 June, but is used for financial and administrative purposes such as demand notices, revenue assessment, rent rolls, and recovery proceedings.
Illustration inside explanation:
If Omkar fails to pay land revenue in December 2023, the default is treated within the revenue year 2023–24.
Additional Example:
Collectors issue annual “jamabandi” records based on the revenue year, not the agricultural year.


● 5. Board (Board of Revenue) – Sections 2(6) & 7

The Board is the highest revenue appellate authority in the State. It supervises Commissioners, hears second appeals, interprets the Code authoritatively, and ensures uniform application of law.
Illustration inside explanation:
When two Commissioners give contradictory views on mutation procedure, the Board resolves the conflict and issues binding circulars.
Additional Example:
If a SDO wrongly rejects a boundary correction application, the aggrieved party can appeal up to the Board under Section 41.


● 6. Bonafide Agriculturist – Section 2(6-a)

This refers to a person who is genuinely engaged in agriculture as a primary occupation and not as a land speculator. It ensures that protections are granted only to real cultivators.
Illustration inside explanation:
If Hariram personally tills 5 acres and depends on it for livelihood, he is a bonafide agriculturist; but if a businessman purchases agricultural land only for investment, he is not.
Additional Example:
In diversion proceedings, a bonafide agriculturist is given priority for conversion of land use.


● 7. Co-operative Society – Section 2(6-b)

A registered society formed for agricultural, credit, or allied purposes. Such societies often manage irrigation schemes, farm machinery, or collective farming units.
Illustration inside explanation:
If 50 farmers form “Bhumiputra Sahkari Samiti” and purchase a tractor collectively, their land dealings fall within this definition.
Additional Example:
A cooperative sugarcane society receiving land lease from the Collector is treated as a single legally recognised entity.


● 8. Government Forest – Section 2(7)

Any land recorded as forest in government registers or notified under forest laws.
Illustration inside explanation:
If the forest map shows survey number 440/1 as Reserved Forest, even if a villager clears bushes and cultivates crops, the land retains its forest character.
Additional Example:
Encroachment on government forest cannot be regularised unless permissible under forest conservation laws.


● 9. Government Lessee – Section 2(8) r/w Sections 181–194

A person to whom the State grants land on lease for cultivation, commercial, residential, or industrial use. Rights are limited to lease terms.
Illustration inside explanation:
If the Collector leases 2 acres to Saroj for a nursery project, she becomes a government lessee but cannot sell the land.
Additional Example:
On expiry of the lease term, land automatically reverts to the State unless renewed.


● 10. Holding – Section 2(10)

The total land held by a tenure-holder (Bhumiswami, tenant, or occupancy tenant).
Illustration inside explanation:
If Madan holds 3 survey numbers—101, 102, and 103—his holding includes all three as a single unit for assessment.
Additional Example:
In ceiling proceedings, the holding definition determines surplus land.


● 11. Improvement – Section 2(13)

Any work that permanently improves land productivity—wells, bunds, reclamation, irrigation channels, orchard planting.
Illustration inside explanation:
If Dayaram constructs a tube-well and cement-lined canal on tenancy land, it counts as improvement, and he may claim compensation if evicted.
Additional Example:
Planting 300 guava trees on barren land also qualifies as improvement.


● 12. Land – Section 2(16)

Includes agricultural land, abadi, forests, pastures, fallow land, tanks, wells, and things attached to earth.
Illustration inside explanation:
If Reena owns a field with a well and a permanent pump house, all structures form part of “land”.
Additional Example:
Trees attached to the soil are treated as part of the land and not separate property.


● 13. Landless Person – Section 2(17)

A person who does not hold land as a Bhumiswami.
Illustration inside explanation:
If Prem works as a labourer and has no recorded holding, he qualifies for government land allotment.
Additional Example:
Land distribution schemes under Section 237 prioritise landless persons.


● 14. Land Records – Section 2(19) r/w Sections 109–134

Includes Khasra, Khatauni, field map, ROR, mutation register.
Illustration inside explanation:
When the Patwari updates crop entries yearly, it becomes part of land records.
Additional Example:
Boundary correction under Section 129 depends entirely on land records.


● 15. Mango Grove – Section 2(19-a)

Land containing mango trees grown for horticultural purposes.
Illustration inside explanation:
If Kamal plants 50 mango trees on 1 hectare, it becomes a mango grove.
Additional Example:
Rent assessment for mango grove differs from agricultural land.


● 16. Orchard – Section 2(22)

Land with fruit-bearing trees planted systematically.
Illustration inside explanation:
If an orchard contains guava, ber, lemon trees, it gets classified separately.
Additional Example:
Diversion for orchard may attract different rates.


● 17. Plot Number – Section 2(23)

Survey number assigned to each parcel of land.
Illustration inside explanation:
Plot number 150/2 helps identify land uniquely in field map.
Additional Example:
Mutation and registry rely on this number.


● 18. Rent – Section 2(23-a)

Amount payable by tenant to landholder.
Illustration inside explanation:
If tenant pays ₹5000 yearly, it is rent, not revenue.
Additional Example:
Failure to pay rent can attract eviction under tenancy rules.


● 19. Revenue Officer – Section 2(24) r/w Sections 11–23

Includes Commissioner, Collector, SDO, Tehsildar, Naib-Tehsildar.
Illustration inside explanation:
If Vijay seeks boundary correction, Tehsildar (Sec. 20) has jurisdiction.
Additional Example:
Appeals lie from Tehsildar → SDO → Collector → Commissioner → Board.


3. CONCLUSION 

Thus, the definitions under Section 2 of the MP LRC lay the legal foundation for the entire land revenue system. They enable precise record-keeping, reduce disputes, clarify powers of authorities, and ensure the fair application of rights. Every revenue entry, mutation, appeal, survey proceeding, tenancy determination, and transfer enquiry depends directly on the clarity provided by these definitions.

  1. Tenant, Tenure-holder.

1. INTRODUCTION (Highly Verbose + Illustration)

Land laws in Madhya Pradesh draw a clear distinction between persons who cultivate land under another’s authority and those who enjoy ownership-like rights over the land. Before consolidation of land revenue laws, the rights of tenants were insecure, eviction was arbitrary, and landholders often exploited cultivators who had no documentary proof of their rights. Many agriculturists cultivated lands for generations but lacked legal recognition.

The M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC) rectifies this by creating clear categories such as tenant, occupancy tenant, government lessee, and tenure-holder (Bhumiswami). These distinctions ensure that revenue officers and courts apply correct rights, remedies, protections, and liabilities.

Illustration:
Imagine two farmers, Ratan and Mohan. Ratan cultivates land belonging to another person under a rent agreement—thus he is a tenant. Mohan holds his land as a Bhumiswami with full heritable and transferable rights—he is a tenure-holder. If a dispute arises, Ratan is protected from illegal eviction but cannot sell the land, while Mohan enjoys full ownership-like powers.
This simple difference changes everything: their rights, remedies, transferability, and protections.


⭐⭐⭐ 2. MEANING OF TENANT (Highly Verbose)

● Tenant – Section 2(1)(z-3)

A tenant refers to a person who holds land from a Bhumiswami, pays rent for it, and enjoys possession for agricultural purposes, but does not possess full ownership rights. A tenant cultivates either under an express lease, implied permission, or long-standing arrangements historically recognised in village records. Tenants occupy a middle ground between labourers and landowners; they possess lawful cultivation rights but lack the legal authority to transfer, mortgage, or permanently alter the land without permission.

Embedded Illustration (inside explanation)

If Ramprasad cultivates 4 acres owned by Keshav and pays yearly rent (lagan), he becomes a tenant even if the agreement is oral. If Keshav attempts to throw him out mid-season, the Tehsildar protects Ramprasad as tenant by referring to Section 2, crop entries in the Khasra, and rent receipts.

Additional Example

Suppose a widow lets out her land for cultivation to a neighbouring farmer on a 5-year rent arrangement. Even without written agreement, the patwari’s khasra entries recording the tenant’s name create a tenant relationship recognised by law.


⭐⭐⭐ 3. RIGHTS OF TENANT (Verbose + Section References)

Right to possession – A tenant cannot be evicted except in accordance with law (derived from Section 182 principles).
Right against arbitrary rent increase – Rent must be reasonable, fixed, and recorded.
Right to crop protection – Standing crops cannot be destroyed by landlord.
Right to claim compensation for improvements – If a tenant digs a well or constructs a bund, he may claim compensation under general agricultural law principles.
Right to challenge illegal eviction – Appeal lies to SDO / Collector.

Illustration:
If a landlord attempts to forcibly plough tenant’s standing wheat crop to evict him, the Tehsildar can restore possession and penalise the landlord.


⭐⭐⭐ 4. LIABILITIES OF TENANT

Paying rent – Tenant must regularly pay rent to Bhumiswami.
No right to transfer – Cannot sell, mortgage or give the land to another without permission.
No right to change land use – Conversion from agriculture to commercial use requires permission under Sections 172–175.
Maintain land in good condition – Tenant is responsible for preventing degradation.

Example:
If the tenant converts the field into a brick kiln without permission, SDO may cancel tenancy.


⭐⭐⭐ 5. TYPES OF TENANTS (Fully Verbose)

1. Ordinary Tenant (General Tenant)

A cultivator who holds land under a Bhumiswami on rent.
Illustration:
If A cultivates on B’s land for ₹12,000 per year, A is an ordinary tenant.

2. Occupancy Tenant – Section 169

An occupancy tenant has heritable but non-transferable rights and enjoys stronger protection than ordinary tenants. They cannot be evicted except for default or improper use.
Illustration:
If Chotelal’s family has cultivated land for decades and entries show occupancy rights, eviction requires Collector’s permission.


⭐⭐⭐ 6. MEANING OF TENURE-HOLDER 

● Tenure-holder / Bhumiswami – Section 158

A tenure-holder, known as Bhumiswami, is a person who possesses absolute, heritable, and transferable rights over land, subject only to restrictions under the Code. The tenure-holder is the highest form of land right recognised in MP LRC—almost equivalent to ownership. The term includes persons who acquired land by inheritance, purchase, grant, exchange, allotment, or statutory conversion from occupancy tenancy to Bhumiswami status.

The essence of being a tenure-holder is that the right is permanent, alienable, and legally secure. Bhumiswami status reflects a landowner’s complete authority, restricted only by land revenue obligations and laws governing transfer of tribal land.

Embedded Illustration 

If Suresh inherits 3 hectares from his father and his name appears in the Record of Rights (ROR) as Bhumiswami, he can mortgage it for a bank loan, sell a portion, or gift it to his daughter. No one can interfere with his rights except through a legal proceeding.

Additional Example:

If the Collector allots 5 acres to a landless person under a rehabilitation scheme and grants Bhumiswami rights, the allottee becomes a tenure-holder with full title.


⭐⭐⭐ 7. RIGHTS OF TENURE-HOLDER 

Right to transfer (Section 165) – The right to sell, gift, exchange, or mortgage property freely.
Right to alienate property inter vivos.
Right to inherit and bequeath (Section 164) – Full heritable rights.
Right to diversion (Sections 172–175) – Land may be diverted for residential, commercial, or industrial use.
Right to lease out land (Section 168) – Subject to restrictions.
Right against unlawful dispossession – Protected by Section 250.
Right to partition (Section 178) – Can seek partition before Tahsildar.

Illustration:
If Mahesh sells one survey number out of four to raise loan for daughter's education, the sale is valid as he is a Bhumiswami with full rights.


⭐⭐⭐ 8. LIABILITIES OF TENURE-HOLDER

Land revenue payment – Must pay assessment under Sections 57–82.
Cultivation obligations – Must use land responsibly; wastage may attract proceedings.
Restrictions on tribal land transfer (Section 170) – Cannot transfer tribal land without permission.
Environmental and boundary obligations – Must maintain boundary marks (Sec. 129).


⭐⭐⭐ 9. DISTINCTION BETWEEN TENANT AND TENURE-HOLDER 

BasisTenantTenure-holder (Bhumiswami)
Statutory BasisSec. 2Sec. 158
OwnershipNo ownershipOwnership-like rights
TransferabilityCannot transferFreely transferable
EvictionProtected but evictableNot evictable except by due process
Land Use ChangeCannot change without permissionHas right to diversion
HeritabilityLimitedFully heritable
RightsCultivation rightsComplete rights

Illustration:
A tenant like Raju can cultivate land but cannot sell even one portion of it. But a tenure-holder like Shyam can legally sell, mortgage, or lease the land at his will.


⭐⭐⭐ 10. IMPORTANT CASE LAWS 

1. Rameshwar v. Jot Ram, AIR 1976 SC 49

Facts: Landlord tried to evict tenant without due process.
Judgment: Tenant’s possession is protected; eviction must follow legal procedure.
Significance: Supports statutory protections to tenants under MP LRC.


2. Bhopal Singh v. State of M.P. (MP High Court)

Judgment: Bhumiswami has superior title; occupancy tenant cannot claim ownership without conversion.
Significance: Clarifies distinction between tenant and tenure-holder.


3. Bhinka v. Charan Singh, AIR 1959 SC 960

Judgment: Courts must interpret tenancy rights broadly to protect cultivators.
Significance: Strengthened tenant protections applicable to MP LRC framework.


⭐⭐⭐ 11. CONCLUSION 

The MP LRC draws a clear statutory dividing line between a tenant—who has secure but limited cultivation rights—and a tenure-holder, who enjoys complete, heritable, and transferable ownership-like rights. This distinction ensures fair distribution of rights, prevents exploitation, and maintains a stable agricultural structure in Madhya Pradesh. Proper identification of whether a person is a tenant or a Bhumiswami lies at the core of every revenue dispute concerning possession, eviction, mutation, rent, transfer, and land use.


Unit – II Revenue Board and Revenue Officer

  1. Constitution and Conditions of service of members.

1. INTRODUCTION

The Board of Revenue is the apex revenue authority under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC). It functions as the highest supervisory, administrative and appellate body within the revenue hierarchy, ensuring uniform interpretation of land laws, correction of errors by subordinate officers, and maintenance of administrative discipline.

Before the Code’s enactment, different regions of MP had different revenue authorities. The MP LRC unified all these by creating a single, authoritative Board.

Illustration:
Imagine two Commissioners issuing contradictory rulings about whether a particular mutation can be done without a succession certificate. Confusion would spread across districts. The Board of Revenue resolves such contradictions and issues binding interpretations.


2. STATUTORY BASIS (SECTIONS 7–10)

The provisions governing constitution, composition, and service conditions of the Board are found under:

  • Section 7 – Constitution of the Board

  • Section 8 – Appointment of President and Members

  • Section 9 – Powers of the State Government

  • Section 10 – Conditions of service, salaries, and tenure

These provisions ensure smooth functioning, independence, and accountability of the Board.


3. MEANING & PURPOSE OF THE BOARD

The Board acts as the highest Revenue Court and administrative authority, similar in structure to a High Court in revenue matters.
It ensures:

  • uniformity in interpretation of revenue laws,

  • efficient appellate disposal,

  • supervision of subordinate offices,

  • administrative guidance in land revenue matters.


4. CONSTITUTION OF THE BOARD – SECTION 7 & 8

1. Establishment

Under Section 7, the State Government establishes the Board of Revenue for the whole State of Madhya Pradesh.

2. Composition

Under Section 8, the Board consists of:

  • A President

  • One or more Members, as the State Government decides.

3. Mode of Appointment

Appointments are made by the State Government through official notifications.

4. Qualifications

Though the Code itself does not mandate educational qualifications, traditionally members are drawn from senior IAS cadre or experienced judicial/revenue officers.

Illustration

If the government feels rising land disputes require more appellate benches, it may appoint two more members to strengthen judicial capacity.


5. CONDITIONS OF SERVICE OF MEMBERS – SECTION 10

Under Section 10, the conditions of service of the President and Members include:

1. Salary and Allowances

These are determined by the State Government and are protected from arbitrary reduction during tenure.

2. Tenure of Office

Members continue in office until they:

  • retire,

  • resign, or

  • are removed for proven misconduct.

3. Security of Tenure

Members cannot be removed arbitrarily; removal requires inquiry and proof of misconduct.

4. Administrative Independence

Conditions ensure impartiality in their quasi-judicial functions.

Example:

If a Member delivers a judgment against the State in a land compensation case, the government cannot reduce his salary as retaliation.


6. POWERS OF THE BOARD OF REVENUE (Highly Developed Points)

1. Supervisory Jurisdiction – Section 7

The Board supervises functioning of all subordinate revenue courts and officers.

2. Appellate Jurisdiction

It hears:

  • second appeals against Collector/Commissioner decisions,

  • certain revisions from subordinate revenue courts.

3. Revisional Powers – Section 50

It can call for records of any subordinate officer to correct:

  • illegality,

  • material irregularity,

  • jurisdictional error.

4. Reference Powers

Complicated questions of law may be referred to larger benches of the Board.

5. Administrative Powers

It may issue circulars, administrative directions, and guidance to subordinate officers.

Illustration:

A Commissioner wrongly excludes daughter’s share in mutation. The Board in revision corrects it and lays down guidelines for all districts.


7. PROCEDURAL POWERS OF BOARD AS REVENUE COURT

The Board is conferred with powers equivalent to a civil court under:

  • summoning,

  • recording evidence,

  • ordering inspections,

  • granting stay orders,

  • executing decisions.

Its decisions bind all subordinate revenue courts.


8. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. State of M.P. v. Babu Ram, MPHC

Facts

Babu Ram challenged the Commissioner’s order denying mutation of agricultural land inherited from his mother. He argued that the Commissioner misinterpreted succession rules. The matter reached the Board of Revenue, which corrected the Commissioner’s interpretation. The State appealed further arguing the Board exceeded jurisdiction.

Judgment

High Court held that the Board has wide appellate and revisional powers to correct errors of law and ensure consistency.

Significance

Confirms Board’s authority as the apex revenue body.


2. Dharamraj v. State of M.P., AIR MP

Facts

A dispute arose about defective demarcation done by Tehsildar. Collector dismissed appeal. Board of Revenue intervened using revisional powers.

Judgment

Court held Board is empowered to correct jurisdictional errors of subordinate officers.

Significance

Reinforces Board’s corrective jurisdiction.


9. OBJECTIVES OF THE BOARD

  • to maintain uniformity in revenue administration,

  • to prevent arbitrary exercise of powers by field officers,

  • to function as the highest revenue court,

  • to evolve consistent legal interpretation.


10. LIMITATIONS

  • cannot override specific statutory provisions,

  • cannot interfere in purely administrative matters unless quasi-judicial,

  • cannot assume jurisdiction beyond Code.


11. CONCLUSION

The Board of Revenue under MP LRC is a foundational institution, ensuring uniformity, fairness, and legality in land administration. Its constitution and service conditions guarantee independence, while its wide appellate and revisional jurisdiction ensure justice in revenue matters.

  1. Jurisdiction of Board and Powers of Board.


1. INTRODUCTION

The jurisdiction and powers of the Board of Revenue are central to the functioning of the entire revenue administration in Madhya Pradesh. Under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC), the Board stands at the apex of the revenue hierarchy and acts as the highest appellate, supervisory, and revisional authority.

Its jurisdiction ensures that inconsistencies in land administration across districts are corrected, subordinate officers follow uniform standards, and errors of law or procedure do not result in injustice.

Illustration:
If one district’s Collector treats “usufructuary mortgage” land as transferable by tenant and another district’s Collector refuses, the Board of Revenue resolves the contradiction, ensuring harmony across the State.


2. STATUTORY BASIS OF JURISDICTION

Sections Relevant to Board Jurisdiction

  • Section 7 – Constitution of Board

  • Section 9 – Powers of State Government relating to Board

  • Section 41 – Appellate jurisdiction

  • Section 50 – Revisional jurisdiction

  • Section 51 – Review powers

  • Section 257–259 (General Procedural Powers)

These provisions collectively establish the Board as the supervisory court for all revenue matters.


3. NATURE OF BOARD’S JURISDICTION

The Board exercises:

  1. Appellate jurisdiction

  2. Revisional jurisdiction

  3. Supervisory jurisdiction

  4. Advisory jurisdiction

  5. Administrative jurisdiction

Each aspect is elaborated below.


4. APPELLATE JURISDICTION (Section 41)

Section 41 grants the Board the authority to hear:

1. Second Appeals

The Board hears second appeals against orders passed by:

  • Commissioner,

  • Collector acting as appellate authority,

  • Settlement Officers in specific matters.

2. Appeals Involving Substantial Questions of Law

Many appeals reach the Board when:

  • interpretation of a section is unclear,

  • conflicting judgments exist at district level,

  • complicated land rights are involved.

3. Appeals Against Orders of Revenue Courts

Orders involving:

  • mutation disputes,

  • demarcation,

  • partition,

  • land revenue assessment,

  • tenancy issues,
    can all be challenged before the Board.

Illustration:
When a Collector rejects an occupancy tenant’s inheritance claim, the aggrieved party can file a second appeal before the Board, which examines errors of law and misapplication of Sections 169 or 158.


5. REVISIONAL JURISDICTION (Section 50)

Section 50 empowers the Board to call for the record of any subordinate revenue court or officer if:

  1. jurisdiction has been exceeded,

  2. jurisdiction not exercised,

  3. material irregularity occurred,

  4. illegality is apparent on the face of the record.

Scope of Revisional Jurisdiction

  • The Board ensures that subordinate courts follow law correctly.

  • It can quash, remand, modify, or reverse orders.

  • It can issue directions for rehearing.

Illustration:

If a Tehsildar rejects a mutation on irrelevant grounds (like personal bias), the Board can set aside the order and direct reconsideration solely based on legal principles.


6. REVIEW POWERS (Section 51)

The Board may review its own orders when:

  • an error apparent on the face of the record exists,

  • new evidence appears which was not available earlier,

  • a significant miscarriage of justice is possible.

Illustration:

If an appeal was dismissed because a party was incorrectly shown as deceased due to clerical error, the Board can review and correct its earlier decision.


7. SUPERVISORY POWERS

The Board has wide powers to supervise:

  • Commissioners,

  • Collectors,

  • Sub-Divisional Officers,

  • Tehsildars,

  • Naib-Tehsildars.

These powers ensure subordinates follow procedure, maintain records, and avoid arbitrary decisions.

Illustration:

If demarcation practices vary across districts, the Board may issue uniform guidelines applicable statewide.


8. ADMINISTRATIVE POWERS

Though primarily a judicial authority, the Board has administrative powers such as:

  • issuing circulars and directions,

  • maintaining discipline among officers,

  • guiding interpretation of important provisions,

  • prescribing procedural formats.

The State Government often relies on the Board when drafting amendments or clarifying settled practices.


9. POWERS AS A “COURT”

State Government, through notifications, confers the status of a Revenue Court on the Board.

Thus, the Board possesses powers akin to a civil court, such as:

  • summoning witnesses,

  • receiving evidence,

  • administering oaths,

  • granting injunctions,

  • ordering inspection and local inquiries.

It also has inherent powers to:

  • prevent abuse of process,

  • secure ends of justice.


10. IMPORTANT CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Rajendra Singh v. Board of Revenue, MP HC

Facts:
Rajendra Singh challenged mutation entries passed by SDO claiming they ignored partition records of 20 years. Collector affirmed SDO’s order. Rajendra approached the Board in second appeal. Board restored correct entries but the State argued that the Board exceeded its jurisdiction.

Judgment:
The High Court upheld the Board’s decision, holding the Board is the highest authority in mutation matters and can correct factual misinterpretation based on documentary evidence.

Significance:
Reaffirmed wide appellate powers of the Board.


2. Dhaniram v. State of M.P. MBLR

Facts:
SDO had ordered reversal of a land transfer based on wrong application of Section 170-B. Collector upheld it. Board intervened in revision, calling the order illegal. State challenged the Board’s intervention.

Judgment:
Court held Board’s revisional jurisdiction is broad and can be invoked to correct jurisdictional errors.

Significance:
Clarifies that the Board can look into cases involving tribal land transfers if lower authorities err.


11. OBJECTIVES BEHIND BOARD’S JURISDICTION

  • Ensuring uniformity across districts

  • Preventing miscarriage of justice

  • Providing a final forum for correcting errors

  • Supervising conduct of subordinate revenue courts

  • Ensuring correct application of technical land laws


12. LIMITATIONS OF BOARD’S POWERS

  • Cannot act contrary to statute

  • Cannot exercise jurisdiction not vested by Code

  • Cannot interfere in executive matters without quasi-judicial character

  • Cannot reopen settled matters beyond limitation period


13. CONCLUSION

The Board of Revenue under MP LRC is a powerful supervisory and appellate institution ensuring consistency and legality in land administration. Its jurisdiction, ranging from appeals and revisions to supervisory and administrative powers, ensures justice and prevents arbitrary decisions by subordinate officers.

  1. Revenue Officers, Their Classes and Powers and Procedure of Revenue Officer and revenue courts

  2. 1. INTRODUCTION

    Revenue Officers form the backbone of the land administration system in Madhya Pradesh. The MP Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC) establishes a structured hierarchy of field-level and supervisory officers who exercise administrative, fiscal, judicial, and quasi-judicial powers. They maintain land records, conduct mutation proceedings, decide tenancy and boundary disputes, assess revenue, and supervise settlement operations.

    A clear and integrated machinery ensures certainty in land rights, efficient execution of government schemes, protection of cultivators, and maintenance of discipline among lower-level staff.

    Illustration:
    If two brothers fight over boundary demarcation, they approach the Tehsildar. If dissatisfied, they appeal to the SDO, then the Collector, and later the Commissioner and Board. This hierarchical judicial system is possible only because the Code defines classes and powers of Revenue Officers.


    2. STATUTORY BASIS (Sections 11–23 of MP LRC)

    Revenue officers are created and empowered through:

    • Section 11 – Classes of Revenue Officers

    • Section 12–23 – Appointment, powers, territorial jurisdiction, duties, transfer of cases

    These provisions ensure a uniform administrative structure across the State.


    3. CLASSES OF REVENUE OFFICERS (Section 11)

    Section 11 divides Revenue Officers into the following hierarchical classes:

    1. Board of Revenue (Apex)

    Largest supervisory authority; highest appellate and revisional body.

    2. Commissioner (Division Level)

    Supervises all Collectors in his division; hears appeals and revisions.

    3. Collector (District Level)

    Administrative head of the district; supervises all tehsils.

    4. Sub-Divisional Officer (Sub-Division Level)

    First appellate authority from Tehsildar orders; primary judicial authority.

    5. Tehsildar (Tehsil Level)

    Major trial court in revenue matters; handles mutation, demarcation, tenancy issues.

    6. Naib-Tehsildar (Assistant)

    Assists Tehsildar; conducts preliminary inquiries.

    7. Settlement Officers (For survey & settlement)

    Handle assessment, re-assessment, classification work.


    4. APPOINTMENT & POWERS OF STATE GOVERNMENT (Sections 12–14)

    1. State Government Appoints All Revenue Officers – Section 12

    Officers are appointed by the State Government through notifications.

    2. Fixation of Local Jurisdiction – Section 13

    The territorial jurisdiction of each officer is defined by the State Government.

    3. Power to Transfer Officers – Section 14

    Government may transfer officers to maintain administrative control.

    Illustration:

    If several land disputes pile up in a tehsil, the Government may transfer an experienced Tehsildar to manage the workload.


    5. POWERS OF INDIVIDUAL REVENUE OFFICERS


    1. Commissioner (Sections 15–16)

    • Supervises Collectors

    • Hears appeals from Collector

    • Issues binding instructions

    • Can call for records for revision

    Example:
    If Collector’s order on mutation contradicts established law, Commissioner can reverse it.


    2. Collector (Section 17)

    • Administrative head of the district

    • Hears appeals against SDO

    • Manages land revenue collection

    • Supervises Patwaris, Revenue Inspectors

    Illustration:
    If Tehsildar wrongly refuses partition, the Collector corrects the order.


    3. Sub-Divisional Officer (Section 18)

    • Primary quasi-judicial authority

    • Supervises Tehsildars

    • Hears appeals from Tehsildars

    SDO plays central role in tenancy disputes, boundary appeals, confiscation matters.


    4. Tehsildar (Section 19)

    Handles most field-level cases:

    • Mutation

    • Demarcation

    • Eviction under Section 250

    • Partition

    • Execution of revenue orders

    Illustration:
    If Khasra entries need correction due to wrong crop entry, Tehsildar corrects them.


    5. Naib-Tehsildar (Section 20)

    Assists Tehsildar; conducts local inspections, preliminary inquiries.


    6. Settlement Officers (Sections 58–82)

    Play key role in:

    • assessment,

    • re-assessment,

    • survey operations,

    • settlement of rent.


    6. POWERS TO TRANSFER CASES (Section 23)

    State Government and superior officers can transfer cases:

    • Collector → may withdraw or transfer cases from SDO/Tehsildar

    • Commissioner → may transfer cases between Collectors

    • Board → may transfer cases between all subordinate courts

    Illustration:

    Bias allegations against a Tehsildar? Commissioner transfers case to another tehsil.


    7. PROCEDURE OF REVENUE OFFICERS & REVENUE COURTS (Sections 30–36; 257–259)

    Revenue officers have powers similar to civil courts:

    1. Summoning Witnesses (Section 30)

    Revenue officers can summon and examine witnesses.

    2. Production of Documents (Section 31)

    They can compel production of land records.

    3. Local Inspection (Section 32–33)

    Officers may inspect land, boundary, crops.

    4. Adjournments and Hearings (Section 34)

    Proper procedure must be followed.

    5. Inherent Powers (Section 257)

    To act ex debito justitiae (to secure justice).

    6. Procedural Rules (Section 258–259)

    They follow rules similar to civil courts for evidence and appeal.

    Illustration:

    During demarcation, Tehsildar may personally visit the disputed boundary.


    8. CONFERRAL OF STATUS OF COURTS (Section 31-A)

    State Government may declare a Revenue Officer as a Revenue Court.
    Once conferred, he enjoys powers such as:

    • taking evidence,

    • issuing decrees,

    • enforcing orders.

    Example:
    SDO is usually a Revenue Court for mutation, tenancy, and partition matters.


    9. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


    1. Dharam Singh v. Collector, Shivpuri (MPHC)

    Facts:
    A Tehsildar rejected mutation based on a misunderstanding of succession law. Appeals failed as Collector upheld the order. In revision, it was found Tehsildar exceeded jurisdiction by interpreting personal law incorrectly.

    Judgment:
    MP High Court held that Revenue Officers must act strictly within their statutory sphere and cannot decide questions of title or personal law.

    Significance:
    Clarified the limits of Revenue Officers’ quasi-judicial powers.


    2. Nandlal v. State of M.P., (MP Board)

    Facts:
    During demarcation, SDO ignored mandatory procedure and completed inquiry in haste. Party approached Board.

    Judgment:
    Board set aside order, emphasizing strict compliance with Sections 129–134.

    Significance:
    Revenue Officers must follow procedure strictly; procedural failure invalidates orders.


    10. OBJECTIVES

    • Ensuring uniform administration

    • Reducing backlog at higher levels

    • Speedy disposal of land disputes

    • Stabilising land records

    • Ensuring justice to cultivators


    11. CONCLUSION

    Revenue Officers under the MP LRC form a well-defined hierarchy vested with judicial and administrative powers. Their structured authority ensures discipline, uniformity, and efficiency in land administration across Madhya Pradesh.


  3. Powers of State Government to alter the limits.

1. INTRODUCTION

The territorial framework of the revenue administration—districts, sub-divisions, tehsils, circles, and other revenue units—is not static in Madhya Pradesh. Owing to administrative convenience, population changes, accessibility, public grievances, and the need for efficient delivery of revenue services, the State Government possesses broad discretionary authority to alter the boundaries of various revenue units.

The Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC) grants explicit powers to the government to create, modify, divide, or abolish revenue divisions. This ensures that land administration remains responsive and functional.

Illustration:
If a tehsil grows rapidly in population and handling the land disputes becomes difficult for a single Tehsildar, the State Government may bifurcate the tehsil to create a new one, say “New Tehsil Prithvipur,” for efficient governance.


2. STATUTORY BASIS — SECTION 27 (General) & RELATED PROVISIONS

The following sections empower the State Government:

  • Section 27 – Power to alter limits of revenue areas

  • Section 12–14 – Appointment and territorial jurisdiction of Revenue Officers

  • Section 49 – Administrative control and reallocation of jurisdiction

  • Section 247 – Special powers relating to administration

These sections collectively allow the State Government to reshape the administrative map of the State.


3. POWER TO ALTER REVENUE AREAS (Section 27)

Under Section 27, the State Government may:

1. Create or Abolish Revenue Divisions

Government may establish a new division or abolish an existing one for efficiency.

2. Change Area of Districts

District boundaries may be enlarged, reduced, split, or reorganized.

3. Alter Sub-divisions (SDOs)

New sub-divisions may be formed to improve accessibility for litigants.

4. Create, Divide, or Consolidate Tehsils

Tehsils are often reorganized for improving mutation, demarcation, and record maintenance.

5. Alter Circles, Patwari Halka, Revenue Inspector Circles

Administrative re-mapping to ensure balanced workload.

Illustration:
If residents of a remote village must travel 22 km to reach the tehsil headquarters for a simple demarcation application, the State Government may carve out a new tehsil closer to them under Section 27.


4. RATIONALE BEHIND ALTERING LIMITS

The aim is to ensure efficient revenue administration through:

  • improved access to revenue courts,

  • better supervision of field staff,

  • reducing burden of heavy caseloads,

  • matching administrative units with population density,

  • ensuring timely service delivery.


5. PROCEDURE FOR ALTERATION OF LIMITS

Although the Code does not prescribe a rigid process, administrative procedure generally involves:

1. Survey & Feasibility Report

Commissioner submits proposal based on population, geography, caseload.

2. Government Notification

Changes are notified in the Official Gazette.

3. Allocation of Officers & Staff

Collectors, SDOs, Patwaris reallocated.

4. Transfer of Records

Land records, maps, and mutation registers are moved to newly created units.

Illustration:

When a new Sub-division is created, all pending appeals under the previous SDO are transferred to the new SDO office.


6. EFFECTS OF ALTERATION OF LIMITS

1. Territorial Jurisdiction Changes

Tehsildars and SDOs will handle cases only within new boundaries.

2. Redistribution of Cases

Pending cases may shift jurisdiction.

3. Updating Records

Patwaris must update village maps and circle registers.

4. Public Impact

Litigants may get nearer access to revenue offices.

Example:
If Village “Bhainsa” is transferred from Tehsil A to Tehsil B, all demarcation and mutation matters shift automatically.


7. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Pannalal v. State of M.P., MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines):

The State Government altered tehsil boundaries, shifting several villages from Tehsil Guna to Tehsil Aron. Some residents challenged the notification claiming lack of public hearing and alleging inconvenience. They argued that the government had acted arbitrarily. Petitioners relied on verbal assurances given earlier by local officials. The High Court examined the legality of altering limits and whether the government must follow a mandatory process.

Judgment:

Court held that altering limits is an administrative function, and Section 27 grants wide discretionary power. Public consultation is not mandatory unless fundamental rights are violated.

Significance:

Confirms that the State’s power to alter administrative units is broad and not easily challengeable.


2. Kishanlal v. State of M.P., Board of Revenue

Facts:

In this case, the State Government created a new Patwari circle, causing transfer of certain villages. A Patwari challenged the change arguing that workload increased. Board held that personal convenience of officers cannot override statutory power of government.

Significance:

Government’s interest in efficient land administration prevails.


8. LIMITATIONS ON POWER OF STATE GOVERNMENT

Although broad, the State’s power is not absolute:

  • Must act reasonably (Article 14).

  • Cannot alter limits for political vendetta.

  • Must follow Gazette notification.

  • Cannot alter limits contrary to explicit statutory provisions.

  • Natural justice applies in certain cases (e.g., when individual rights are deeply impacted).


9. CONCLUSION

The State Government’s power to alter limits of revenue units is essential for maintaining a responsive and efficient land administration system. Section 27 empowers the State to adapt territorial divisions according to changing population needs, administrative demands, and public convenience. Courts have consistently upheld this power, recognizing it as a cornerstone of revenue governance.

  1. Powers of State Government of appointing Revenue Officers.

. INTRODUCTION

The Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC) establishes a complete and hierarchical administrative structure for land governance. At the apex is the State Government, which possesses the authority to create posts, appoint Revenue Officers, determine their jurisdiction, reassign duties, and monitor their functions. The State Government’s power to appoint Revenue Officers ensures uniformity, administrative efficiency, and accountability throughout the State.

Without this centralized power, revenue administration would be fragmented, inconsistent, and prone to arbitrary local variations.

Illustration:
If the government notices an increase in demarcation disputes in a newly urbanised area, it may appoint an additional Tehsildar to reduce pendency. These administrative adjustments directly affect the accessibility of justice for citizens.


2. STATUTORY BASIS — SECTIONS 12–14 OF MP LRC

The relevant provisions empowering the State Government are:

  • Section 12 – Classes of Revenue Officers & their appointment

  • Section 13 – Local jurisdiction to be fixed by the State Government

  • Section 14 – Control, transfer, and withdrawal of powers of Revenue Officers

These provisions collectively vest the State Government with the authority to appoint, define, and modify the functioning of Revenue Officers.


3. CLASSES OF REVENUE OFFICERS APPOINTED BY STATE GOVERNMENT — SECTION 12

Under Section 12, the State Government appoints the following Revenue Officers:

  1. Commissioners (Divisional level)

  2. Collectors (District level)

  3. Sub-Divisional Officers (Revenue) (Subdivision level)

  4. Tehsildars

  5. Naib-Tehsildars

  6. Settlement Officers / Assistant Settlement Officers

  7. Revenue Inspectors

  8. Patwaris

Illustration:

To manage rapid urban expansion in Bhopal, the State Government may appoint an additional Sub-Divisional Officer for better disposal of land disputes.


4. POWER TO APPOINT — SECTION 12

1. Appointment Authority

State Government issues official notifications appointing:

  • Commissioners as heads of divisions,

  • Collectors as heads of districts,

  • SDOs at sub-divisional levels, etc.

2. Recruitment Sources

Revenue officers may be appointed from:

  • IAS cadre,

  • State Administrative Services,

  • Revenue Department cadre (Naib-Tehsildar, Patwari),

  • Special appointment for survey operations.

3. Eligibility and Qualifications

Although not explicitly defined in the Code, appointments follow civil service rules of MP.

Example:

A senior State Administrative Service (SAS) officer may be appointed as Collector of Jabalpur by a government order.


5. POWER TO FIX LOCAL JURISDICTION — SECTION 13

State Government determines the territorial limits within which Revenue Officers work.

This includes assigning officers to:

  • a division,

  • a district,

  • a subdivision,

  • a tehsil,

  • a circle or halka.

Illustration:

Village “Rampuri” may be shifted from Tehsil A to Tehsil B; consequently, a new Tehsildar will exercise jurisdiction.


6. POWER OF TRANSFER, CONTROL & REMOVAL — SECTION 14

The State Government maintains disciplinary and supervisory control:

1. Transfer of Revenue Officers

To balance workload or maintain neutrality.

2. Suspension and Removal

For misconduct or inefficiency, subject to service rules.

3. Allocation of Duties

State Government may assign additional roles—e.g., Tehsildar may also be Sub-Registrar.

Illustration:

If a Tehsildar is accused of bias in a family land dispute, the State may transfer him to another tehsil to maintain fairness.


7. POWER TO WITHDRAW POWERS OR DELEGATE POWERS

1. Withdrawal of Powers

State may withdraw powers of any officer if:

  • misuse,

  • administrative misconduct,

  • incompetence.

2. Delegation of Powers

May delegate powers from senior to junior officers for efficiency.

Example:

Collector may be delegated power to decide diversion cases ordinarily handled by Commissioner.


8. REASONS FOR CENTRALIZED APPOINTMENT POWER

  • Ensures uniform application of land revenue laws

  • Promotes administrative discipline

  • Avoids local interference

  • Enables redistribution of officers based on caseload

  • Facilitates quick posting in disaster-affected areas


9. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Chhotelal v. State of M.P., MPHC

Facts:

Petitioner challenged transfer of a Tehsildar alleging mala fide motives due to local political pressure. State argued that transfer was routine administrative action under Section 14. Case focused on limits of government’s power to transfer revenue officers.

Judgment:

Court held that transfer is a prerogative of the State Government unless mala fides are convincingly demonstrated. Administrative interest takes precedence.

Significance:

Confirms wide powers of the State under Section 14.


2. Girdhari Singh v. State of M.P., Board of Revenue

Facts:

A Patwari challenged his removal from a halka. Board noted numerous pending disputes and poor record management. The State acted under Section 13.

Judgment:

Board upheld action, ruling that administrative re-allocation falls squarely within State’s authority.

Significance:

Reinforces State Government’s discretion over local jurisdiction assignments.


10. LIMITATIONS ON THE STATE’S POWER

Even though broad, powers are limited by:

  • Constitutional mandates (Article 14 & 16)

  • Service rules & disciplinary regulations

  • Natural justice (in case of punitive action)

  • Judicial review if action is mala fide or arbitrary


11. CONCLUSION

The powers of the State Government under Sections 12–14 of the MP LRC form the administrative foundation of the land revenue system. By appointing and managing Revenue Officers, the State ensures continuity, discipline, and efficiency in land governance. Judicial decisions consistently reaffirm this centralized authority, making it indispensable to effective land administration in Madhya Pradesh.


  1. Sub-Divisional Officers.

. INTRODUCTION

A Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO), also known as Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) or Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM), occupies a central position within the revenue hierarchy of Madhya Pradesh. Positioned between the Collector and the Tehsildar, the SDO acts as the most important quasi-judicial authority for land disputes, appeals, boundary matters, tenancy issues, partition, diversion appeals, and revenue recovery.

SDOs are often called the "first real court" for most revenue disputes because the majority of appeals from Tehsildars lie before them, making their role vital for justice delivery.

Illustration:
If a Tehsildar wrongly rejects a mutation application or conducts a defective demarcation, the aggrieved party approaches the SDO for correction. This demonstrates the SDO’s supervisory and appellate role.


2. STATUTORY BASIS — SECTION 18 (Read With Sections 11–23)

The appointment, powers, and jurisdiction of SDOs arise from:

  • Section 11 – SDO listed as Revenue Officer class

  • Section 12 – Appointment by State Government

  • Section 13 – Government assigns local jurisdiction

  • Section 18 – Powers, jurisdiction, and functions of SDO

These sections together establish the SDO’s authority.


3. POSITION OF SDO IN THE REVENUE HIERARCHY

Hierarchy under the MP LRC:

  1. Board of Revenue

  2. Commissioner

  3. Collector

  4. SDO (Sub-Division)

  5. Tehsildar

  6. Naib-Tehsildar

  7. Patwari / Revenue Inspector

The SDO is superior to Tehsildars and Naib-Tehsildars and subordinate to the Collector.


4. APPOINTMENT & JURISDICTION OF SDO (Sections 12 & 13)

  • Appointed by the State Government.

  • Assigned jurisdiction over one or more sub-divisions.

  • Supervises all tehsils within his subdivision.

  • Exercises both administrative and judicial powers.

Example:
If District Jabalpur has three sub-divisions, each will have its own SDO with separate territorial jurisdiction.


5. JUDICIAL & QUASI-JUDICIAL POWERS OF SDO

SDOs act as:

1. Appellate Authority Over Tehsildar (Section 41)

All appeals from Tehsildar’s orders lie before the SDO unless otherwise provided.

Examples of orders commonly appealed:

  • Mutation under Section 109

  • Demarcation under Section 129

  • Eviction under Section 250

  • Partition orders under Section 178

Illustration:

If Tehsildar cancels a mutation citing wrong successor, the SDO may examine ROR, Khasra, and succession rules to correct the error.


2. Supervisory Authority Over Tehsildars (Section 18)

The SDO can call for files, inspect ongoing proceedings, and issue directions to ensure proper procedure.

3. Power to Conduct Inquiries

SDO may summon witnesses, inspect land, and examine documents.

4. Power to Decide Tenancy Disputes

SDO hears appeals regarding:

  • tenant eviction,

  • arrears of rent,

  • crop compensation disputes.

Illustration:

A tenant wrongly evicted by landlord may appeal to SDO who can reinstate possession.


6. ADMINISTRATIVE POWERS OF SDO

1. Revenue Assessment & Recovery Supervision

Ensures Tehsildar recovers land revenue promptly.

2. Maintenance of Law & Order (Magisterial Powers)

Though separate from MP LRC, SDO often holds magisterial powers under CrPC.

3. Supervision of Patwaris & Revenue Inspectors

SDO ensures they maintain Khasra, Khatauni, maps, and registers correctly.

4. Natural Calamity Assessment

SDO assesses crop loss and recommends relief.

Example:
In case of hailstorm damage, the SDO conducts spot inspections for compensation.


7. APPEAL FROM SDO’S ORDER — SECTION 41

Appeals from SDO lie before the:

  • Collector (in most cases),

  • Commissioner,

  • depending upon rules framed under MP LRC.

This keeps SDO decisions under constant judicial check.


8. POWERS OF SDO TO TRANSFER CASES (Section 23)

SDO may transfer cases:

  • between Tehsildars,

  • to himself for fair trial,

  • from a biased or junior officer to another.

Illustration:
If a Tehsildar is closely related to a party in a land dispute, SDO may withdraw the case to avoid bias.


9. PROCEDURAL POWERS OF SDO (Sections 30–36, 257–259)

SDO has all procedural powers of a civil court:

  • summoning witnesses,

  • requiring documents,

  • conducting local inspection,

  • allowing adjournments,

  • recording evidence,

  • granting temporary stay orders,

  • executing his own orders.

Example:
SDO may personally visit disputed boundary village to check alignment with field map.


10. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Bhagwandas v. State of M.P., MPHC

Facts:

A Tehsildar rejected partition of agricultural land citing lack of cooperation between co-sharers. Appeal was filed before the SDO. SDO dismissed the appeal without hearing both sides adequately. Aggrieved party approached the High Court arguing denial of natural justice.

Judgment:

Court held SDO’s power includes judicial responsibility to hear both parties fully. Orders passed without proper inquiry are invalid.

Significance:

Reinforces SDO’s duty to act as a quasi-judicial authority ensuring fairness.


2. Radheshyam v. State of M.P., Board of Revenue

Facts:

Tehsildar conducted a demarcation ignoring mandatory map verification. Appeal to SDO was dismissed. Board found the Tehsildar erred and SDO failed to correct the procedural irregularity.

Judgment:

Board set aside SDO’s order and ordered fresh demarcation strictly under Section 129–130.

Significance:

SDO must supervise Tehsildars' work and ensure procedural compliance.


11. OBJECTIVES OF SDO’S POWERS

  • Ensuring efficient appellate mechanism

  • Supervising Tehsildars and ensuring administrative discipline

  • Acting as first major court for most revenue disputes

  • Reducing burden on Collector and Commissioner

  • Ensuring correct and lawful application of the Code


12. LIMITATIONS

  • Cannot decide complex title disputes

  • Cannot override statutory provisions

  • Jurisdiction defined strictly by State Government

  • Subject to appeal before Collector


13. CONCLUSION

The Sub-Divisional Officer plays a crucial dual role: enforcing administrative efficiency and delivering quasi-judicial justice. Positioned strategically in the hierarchy, the SDO ensures supervision of Tehsildars, fair adjudication of disputes, and uniform implementation of land revenue laws across the sub-division.

  1. Powers to transfer Cases. 

1. INTRODUCTION

The efficient functioning of the revenue judicial system depends not only on the powers of each revenue court but also on the flexibility to transfer cases between authorities when needed. The MP Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC) recognizes that justice may be compromised if a case is heard by an officer lacking jurisdiction, impartiality, availability, or administrative capability.

To prevent miscarriage of justice and maintain administrative balance, the Code provides broad powers for withdrawal, transfer, and reallocation of cases across the hierarchy of revenue authorities.

Illustration:
If a Tehsildar is personally related to one party in a land dispute or is accused of bias, the case must be transferred to ensure impartiality. Otherwise, confidence in the revenue judicial system breaks down.


2. STATUTORY BASIS — SECTION 23 OF MP LRC

The primary provision is:

  • Section 23 – Power to withdraw and transfer cases

This section empowers the State Government and superior officers to shift cases from one revenue authority to another.

It ensures:

  • fairness,

  • administrative convenience,

  • neutrality,

  • timely disposal.


3. AUTHORITIES EMPOWERED TO TRANSFER CASES UNDER SECTION 23

1. State Government

May transfer any case from one Revenue Officer to another:

  • within the same district,

  • between districts,

  • between divisions.

2. Board of Revenue

May transfer:

  • appeals,

  • revisions,

  • reviews
    from any subordinate revenue authority.

3. Commissioner

May transfer:

  • cases between Collectors,

  • cases between SDOs.

4. Collector

May transfer:

  • cases between SDOs under him,

  • cases between Tehsildars under him.

5. Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO)

May transfer:

  • cases between Tehsildars,

  • cases from Tehsildar to himself,

  • cases from Naib-Tehsildar.

Illustration:

If two Tehsildars have heavy pendency, Collector may transfer cases from one to another to balance workload.


4. GROUNDS FOR TRANSFER OF CASES

Revenue cases may be transferred when:

1. Bias or reasonable apprehension of bias

If an officer is personally connected to a party.

2. Lack of jurisdiction

Wrongly filed cases must be transferred.

3. Pendency of heavy workload

To avoid delays.

4. Administrative necessity

New tehsils, settlements, or changes in boundaries.

5. Complaint against officer

Complaint of misconduct can prompt transfer.

6. Complexity of case

Higher authority may withdraw complicated cases.

Illustration:

If a litigant claims Tehsildar is delaying mutation for bribe, SDO may withdraw case and decide it personally.


5. PROCEDURE FOR TRANSFER OF CASES

Although Section 23 is enabling and broad, certain procedural safeguards are followed:

1. Application for Transfer

Parties may apply to the competent authority.

2. Hearing the Opposite Party

Natural justice applies in major disputes.

3. Speaking Order

Reasons must be recorded.

4. Notification or Written Order

Transfer orders must be formally documented.

Illustration:

A boundary dispute transferred from Tehsildar to SDO must mention the administrative reason or allegation of bias.


6. EFFECT OF TRANSFER

1. Jurisdiction shifts immediately

The receiving officer gains full authority over the case.

2. All proceedings remain valid

Evidence already recorded is usually preserved.

3. No de novo trial unless required

Case continues unless procedural defect exists.

4. Prevents forum shopping

Litigants cannot misuse transfer provisions.

Example:

If Collector withdraws a case from a Tehsildar, the Tehsildar must immediately forward the record to the SDO.


7. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Ramgopal v. State of M.P., MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines):

Ramgopal filed for partition before Tehsildar. Opposing party alleged bias due to Tehsildar’s friendship with Ramgopal’s cousin. SDO refused transfer application. Aggrieved party approached High Court claiming apprehension of bias. Case revolved around whether transfer should be allowed on mere suspicion or reasonable apprehension.

Judgment:

High Court held that when reasonable apprehension exists, transfer is justified. Ordered SDO to withdraw case and assign to another Tehsildar.

Significance:

Strengthens fairness by preventing conflict of interest.


2. Sharda Bai v. Collector, Indore (Board of Revenue)

Facts:

Widow sought transfer of mutation case claiming Tehsildar had excessive delay due to pressure from influential persons. Collector transferred case to another Tehsildar. Opposite party challenged alleging bias in transfer.

Judgment:

Board upheld Collector’s right to transfer for administrative convenience.

Significance:

Administrative necessity is a valid ground for transfer.


8. OBJECTIVES OF TRANSFER OF CASES

  • to ensure impartial adjudication,

  • to balance workload,

  • to prevent delay,

  • to promote administrative convenience,

  • to ensure justice is not only done but appears to be done.


9. LIMITATIONS

  • Transfer cannot be done arbitrarily.

  • Natural justice must be respected.

  • Cannot be used to favour any party.

  • Judicial review applies against mala fide transfers.


10. CONCLUSION

Section 23 of the MP LRC ensures flexible and fair functioning of the revenue judicial system by allowing transfer of cases across officers. This prevents bias, delays, and administrative inefficiency, and ensures justice delivery remains swift, impartial, and accessible.

  1. Conferral of Status of Courts, Inherent Powers and other Powers of Revenue Courts.

1. INTRODUCTION

Revenue Officers under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC) are not merely administrative authorities; they also act as Revenue Courts when exercising judicial or quasi-judicial functions. To maintain uniform standards of justice, the Code provides for:

  1. Conferral of status of courts,

  2. Inherent powers, and

  3. Procedural and other judicial powers.

These provisions ensure that hearings, evidence, appeals, and execution in revenue matters reflect judicial fairness similar to civil courts.

Illustration:
When a Tehsildar decides mutation or eviction under Section 250, he is functioning as a Revenue Court, not just an administrative officer. His orders must follow judicial procedure, evidence rules, and principles of natural justice.


2. STATUTORY BASIS — SECTIONS 31, 31-A & 257–259

The primary provisions are:

  • Section 31 — Revenue Officers to exercise powers of civil courts for specific purposes

  • Section 31-A — Conferral of status of a Revenue Court

  • Sections 257–259 — Inherent powers, judicial powers, and procedure

Together they create a judicial framework for revenue adjudication.


3. CONFERRAL OF STATUS OF COURTS — SECTION 31-A

Section 31-A empowers the State Government to declare certain Revenue Officers as Revenue Courts, enabling them to:

  • hear disputes,

  • take evidence,

  • pass decrees and orders,

  • enforce their orders,

  • exercise appellate or revisional functions.

Officers commonly declared as Revenue Courts:

  • Board of Revenue (Apex)

  • Commissioner

  • Collector

  • Sub-Divisional Officer

  • Tehsildar

Illustration:

A Tehsildar deciding a partition case under Section 178 acts as a court, not as a mere administrative authority.


4. INHERENT POWERS OF REVENUE COURTS — SECTION 257

Section 257 gives Revenue Courts inherent powers similar to Civil Courts to:

  • prevent abuse of process,

  • secure ends of justice,

  • pass orders necessary for justice even if not expressly provided.

This section empowers Revenue Courts to act where the Code is silent.

Illustration:

If a litigant tries to withdraw a case at the final stage to avoid an unfavourable judgment, the SDO may refuse withdrawal using inherent powers to prevent abuse of process.


5. POWERS OF CIVIL COURTS EXERCISED BY REVENUE COURTS — SECTION 31

When acting judicially, Revenue Officers have the powers of civil courts regarding:

1. Summoning & enforcing attendance of witnesses

2. Compelling production of documents

3. Administering oaths & receiving evidence

4. Local inspection & site visits

5. Granting adjournments

6. Issuing temporary injunctions/stay orders

7. Executing orders and decrees

Example:
In demarcation disputes under Section 129, the SDO may summon Patwari and require production of land records.


6. OTHER POWERS OF REVENUE COURTS (Sections 258–259)

1. Procedure Where Not Provided

Revenue Courts follow:

  • natural justice principles,

  • civil court practice,

  • government rules.

2. Judicial Record Keeping

Orders must be written, signed, reasoned.

3. Execution of Orders

Revenue Courts may attach property, issue warrants, or enforce possession.

4. Power to Review Orders (Section 51 read with Section 31-A)

When acting as Revenue Courts, officers may review their orders.


7. POWERS SPECIFIC TO DIFFERENT REVENUE COURTS

1. Tehsildar (Trial Court level)

  • Mutation trial

  • Demarcation inquiry

  • Eviction under Section 250

  • Partition of agricultural land

  • Execution of revenue orders

2. Sub-Divisional Officer (First Appellate Court)

  • Appeal from Tehsildar

  • Revision in specific cases

  • Supervisory power over Tehsildar

3. Collector (Second Appellate Authority)

  • Appeals from SDO

  • Revision over Tehsildar/SDO

  • Power to call records

4. Commissioner & Board of Revenue (Higher Courts)

  • Second appeals

  • Revisions

  • Judicial directions & interpretations


8. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Keshav Prasad v. State of M.P., MPHC

Facts:

A Tehsildar rejected a mutation application without providing an opportunity to the opposite party to rebut evidence. The applicant challenged this before the SDO, who upheld the order claiming Tehsildar acted administratively. High Court had to decide whether mutation proceedings are judicial or administrative.

Judgment:

Court held Tehsildar acts as a Revenue Court while deciding mutation. Judicial procedure must be followed.

Significance:

Mutation orders must follow principles of fair hearing and recording of reasons.


2. Jwala Prasad v. Board of Revenue, MBLR

Facts:

A demarcation dispute was dismissed without local inspection. Applicant claimed injustice. SDO said local inspection is discretionary. Board disagreed, stating failure to inspect deprived parties of fair adjudication.

Judgment:

Board held that Revenue Courts have power and duty to conduct site inspection where necessary for justice.

Significance:

Affirms the judicial obligation of Revenue Courts to ascertain facts thoroughly.


9. OBJECTIVES BEHIND CONFERRAL OF COURT STATUS

  • Ensuring judicial fairness

  • Avoiding arbitrariness

  • Maintaining procedural consistency

  • Protecting rights of cultivators

  • Strengthening justice delivery


10. LIMITATIONS ON REVENUE COURT POWERS

Revenue Courts cannot decide:

  • complex title disputes,

  • permanent injunction suits,

  • civil matters beyond revenue proceeding scope,

  • matters reserved exclusively for civil courts.

Revenue Courts are courts of limited jurisdiction.


11. CONCLUSION

Conferral of court status, inherent powers, and judicial authorities under Sections 31, 31-A, and 257–259 create a robust system enabling Revenue Officers to function as courts with procedural rigor. This ensures that land disputes are handled fairly, efficiently, and in accordance with principles of justice similar to civil courts.


  1. Appeal, Revision and Review.

. INTRODUCTION

The Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC) establishes a hierarchical appellate structure to ensure that errors committed by subordinate revenue authorities are corrected through appeal, revision, and review. These three remedies form the backbone of procedural justice in revenue matters. Without these mechanisms, revenue orders could become arbitrary, final, and uncorrectable.

Illustration:
If a Tehsildar wrongly refuses a mutation entry because he misunderstands succession law, the aggrieved party can file an appeal before the SDO. If the SDO also errs, a second appeal lies before Collector/Commissioner. If legal error persists, the Board can intervene in revision under Section 50.

Thus, appellate remedies ensure fairness, consistency, and legality.


2. STATUTORY BASIS

The key provisions are:

  • Sections 41–47 → Appeals

  • Section 50 → Revision

  • Section 51 → Review

  • Sections 257–259 → Procedural powers


3. APPEALS — SECTION 41–47

Appeal = correction of error by superior authority on questions of fact or law.


A. First Appeal (Section 41)

First appeals lie from:

  • Tehsildar → SDO

  • SDO → Collector

  • Collector → Commissioner

  • Commissioner → Board of Revenue

Scope of First Appeal

  • re-examination of facts,

  • appreciation of evidence,

  • correction of procedural errors,

  • evaluation of documents (ROR, Khasra, maps).

Illustration:
If Tehsildar refuses mutation because he doubts the genuineness of a will, the SDO can examine the will, hear evidence, and correct the decision.


B. Second Appeal (Section 44)

Second appeal lies to:

  • Board of Revenue (Apex revenue appellate authority)

Second appeal is mostly on substantial questions of law.

Example:
Whether occupancy tenant becomes Bhumiswami automatically after 30 years is a substantial question.


C. Limitation Periods for Appeals (Section 45)

  • 30 days for first appeal

  • 60 days for second appeal

  • Delay condonable if sufficient cause shown (Section 46)


4. REVISION — SECTION 50

Revision is a supervisory remedy used to correct:

  • jurisdictional errors,

  • illegal exercise of power,

  • material irregularities,

  • misapplication of law.

Authorities having revisional powers:

  • Board of Revenue → highest revisional authority

  • Commissioner → revision over Collector/SDO

  • Collector → revision over Tehsildar

Illustration:

If Tehsildar demarcates land without issuing notice to all parties, Collector can set aside the order in revision.

When Revision is maintainable?

  • when no appeal lies,

  • when issue involves legality or jurisdiction,

  • when order is perverse.


5. REVIEW — SECTION 51

Review is a remedy before the same authority to correct:

  • an error apparent on the face of record,

  • discovery of new evidence not earlier available,

  • mistaken assumption of fact.

Review ≠ Appeal

Review only corrects self-evident mistakes.

Illustration:
If order mistakenly records person as deceased, SDO may review the order.


6. STAY OF EXECUTION OF ORDERS

Appellate or revisional authority may stay execution of the order under challenge to prevent irreparable harm.

Example:
Board may stay eviction order passed by Collector until final disposal.


7. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Ramesh Kumar v. State of M.P., MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines)

A Tehsildar passed an eviction order under Section 250 without giving the applicant a chance to present revenue records proving long-standing possession. The SDO upheld the order without examining entries from the Khasra and ROR. Collector dismissed appeal citing technicalities. Aggrieved party approached High Court arguing violation of principles of natural justice.

Judgment

High Court held that revenue appellate authorities must examine evidence independently and cannot mechanically affirm lower orders.

Significance

Clarifies scope of first appeal and importance of judicial application of mind.


2. Babulal v. Board of Revenue, MBLR

Facts

Mutation rejected by Tehsildar. SDO and Collector upheld the decision. Petitioner filed revision. Board found Collector ignored crucial succession documents and exercised jurisdiction arbitrarily.

Judgment

Board set aside all lower orders, emphasising revisional power to correct injustice.

Significance

Revision ensures legality even when multiple appellate layers err.


3. Girdhari v. State of M.P., MPHC

Facts

Collector refused to review an assessment order though new evidence showed clerical error in land measurement. High Court determined whether review was justified.

Judgment

Court held review is mandatory where correcting clerical error prevents injustice.

Significance

Clarifies scope of review under Section 51.


8. DISTINCTION BETWEEN APPEAL, REVISION, REVIEW

BasisAppealRevisionReview
AuthorityHigher authoritySupervisory authoritySame authority
ScopeFacts + lawLegalityError on face
EvidenceRe-appreciatedLimitedNo new except discovered
ObjectiveCorrect errorPrevent illegalityCorrect mistake

9. OBJECTIVES

  • preventing miscarriage of justice

  • ensuring fairness

  • correcting errors

  • creating uniformity in revenue administration

  • providing hierarchy for accountability


10. CONCLUSION

Appeal, revision, and review under MP LRC ensure justice, legality, and fairness. They constitute a robust multi-level mechanism enabling correction of errors committed by subordinate revenue authorities.

  1. Appellate Authorities and their powers and limitation for appeals.

  2. 1. INTRODUCTION

    The appellate system under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC) creates a structured hierarchy to ensure correction of errors committed by subordinate revenue officers. Appellate authorities serve as checks and balances against arbitrary orders, procedural irregularities, and misinterpretation of land laws.

    Land disputes—mutation, partition, demarcation, tenancy, diversion, land revenue recovery—usually begin before the Tehsildar. Errors at this stage can severely affect land rights. Therefore, the Code mandates statutory appeal routes before higher authorities such as SDO, Collector, Commissioner, and the Board of Revenue.

    Illustration:
    If a Tehsildar rejects a mutation by wrongly ignoring a registered will, the SDO as appellate authority can re-examine the will, call for records, and correct the error—thereby preventing injustice.


    2. STATUTORY BASIS FOR APPEALS

    Relevant sections:

    • Sections 41–47 → Appeals

    • Section 45 → Limitation period

    • Section 46 → Condonation of delay

    • Section 48–49 → Effect of appeal and powers

    These sections collectively define the framework, powers, and time limits for appeals.


    3. APPELLATE AUTHORITIES UNDER MP LRC

    The hierarchy of appellate authorities:

    1. Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO)

    – First appellate authority over Tehsildar.

    2. Collector

    – First appeal from SDO or second appeal from Tehsildar (depending on rules).

    3. Commissioner

    – Appellate authority over Collector’s orders in many cases.

    4. Board of Revenue

    – Highest appellate authority; hears second appeals and some first appeals.


    4. POWERS OF APPELLATE AUTHORITIES (Section 48)

    Appellate authorities possess wide judicial powers similar to civil appellate courts.


    1. Power to Examine Legality & Propriety

    Appellate authority may examine:

    • whether procedure was followed,

    • whether evidence was properly appreciated,

    • whether findings are reasonable.

    Illustration:

    If Tehsildar ignores revenue map (FMB) while deciding boundary dispute, SDO may correct this.


    2. Power to Re-Appreciate Evidence

    They can:

    • reassess documents,

    • take additional evidence,

    • summon witnesses.


    3. Power to Modify, Reverse, or Confirm Orders

    Appellate authority may:

    • affirm the original order,

    • modify certain conclusions,

    • set aside entire judgment,

    • remand the case for fresh trial.

    Example:

    Collector may send mutation case back to Tehsildar for fresh verification of heirs.


    4. Power to Call for Records

    Under Sections 41–48, appellate authorities may demand the complete case record for scrutiny.


    5. Power to Stay Execution

    They may grant stay orders to prevent:

    • eviction,

    • demolition,

    • loss of crops,

    • alteration of possession.

    Illustration:
    Board of Revenue may stay Collector’s eviction order until the appeal is decided.


    6. Power to Admit Additional Grounds

    Even if a ground was not raised earlier, appellate authority may consider it if substantial justice demands.


    5. LIMITATION PERIODS FOR APPEALS (Section 45)

    Statutory periods:

    Type of AppealLimitation (Days)
    First Appeal30 days
    Second Appeal60 days
    Appeal to Board of Revenue45–60 days depending on nature

    Condonation of Delay — Section 46

    Authorities may condone delay if:

    • sufficient cause is shown,

    • illness, incorrect legal advice, or administrative delay is proven.


    6. LIMITATIONS ON APPELLATE JURISDICTION

    Despite wide powers, appellate authority is constrained by:


    1. Cannot Take New Evidence Without Justification

    Additional evidence allowed only when:

    • lower authority wrongly rejected it, or

    • evidence was genuinely unavailable.


    2. Cannot Travel Beyond Issues Raised

    Appeal must deal with grounds in memo, unless additional issues affect justice.


    3. Cannot Decide Questions of Title (Civil Court Matters)

    Revenue appellate authorities cannot:

    • decree title,

    • decide ownership disputes requiring civil adjudication.

    Illustration:

    If real issue is which brother truly owns the land (not mutation), civil court must decide.


    4. Bound By Statute and Precedent

    Cannot override:

    • statutory bars,

    • time limits,

    • Board of Revenue circulars.


    5. Cannot Entertain Time-Barred Appeal Without Sufficient Cause

    There must be a legally justified explanation for delay.


    6. Cannot Grant Relief Beyond Jurisdiction

    Example:
    An SDO cannot cancel patta issued by Collector.


    7. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


    1. Shyamlal v. State of M.P., MPHC

    Facts (8–10 lines)

    A mutation was granted in favour of Shyamlal’s cousin based on oral statements. Shyamlal filed an appeal before SDO, claiming his adoption deed and registered will were ignored. The SDO dismissed the appeal without examining documents. Collector affirmed SDO’s order. High Court examined whether appellate authority is duty-bound to re-evaluate evidence.

    Judgment

    Court held that appellate authority must apply mind independently to evidence and cannot simply rubber-stamp Tehsildar’s findings.

    Significance

    Clarifies appellate authority’s duty to re-assess documents and evidence.


    2. Hariram v. Board of Revenue, MBLR

    Facts

    The Collector dismissed an appeal against demarcation order as time-barred by 5 days. Revision before Board showed delay occurred due to wrong advice given by legal counsel.

    Judgment

    Board condoned delay, holding that limitation laws must be interpreted to advance substantial justice.

    Significance

    Explains flexible approach to limitation where genuine delay exists.


    3. Sundarlal v. Commissioner, Rewa Division, MPHC

    Facts

    Commissioner upheld SDO order without analyzing contradictions in Khasra entries. Petitioner alleged mechanical approbation.

    Judgment

    Court held that appellate authority must give reasoned order showing application of mind.

    Significance

    Reasoned orders are mandatory.


    8. OBJECTIVES OF APPELLATE SYSTEM

    • correction of errors,

    • uniform interpretation of revenue law,

    • prevention of injustice,

    • supervision over subordinate officers,

    • protection of cultivators’ rights,

    • promotion of transparency and accountability.


    9. CONCLUSION

    The appellate authorities under MP LRC play a crucial role in ensuring justice, correcting errors, and maintaining uniformity across the revenue hierarchy. Their powers are broad but guided by statutory limitations to prevent misuse. The appellate structure acts as a multi-layered safety mechanism safeguarding land rights and revenue administration.


  3. Revision.

  4. Review of orders.

  5. Stay of execution of orders 97 Land and Land Revenue.

  6. State ownership in all lands, Liability of land to pay land revenue, land exempted from payment of land revenue, and variation of land revenue.

  7. Assessment, Reassessment.

  8. Revenue Survey and Settlement in Non-Urban Area.

  9. Appointment and Powers of Settlement Officers.

  10. Revenue Survey.

  11. Settlement of Rent.

  12. Assessment and Re-Assessment of Land in Urban Area.

  13. Land Records.

  14. Formation of circles and appointment of Patwari and Revenue Inspectors.

  15. Land Records, Field Map, Record of rights.

  16. Realization of Land Revenue.


Unit – III Tenure Holders

  1. Bhuswami.

BHUMISWAMI (TENURE-HOLDER) UNDER THE MP LAND REVENUE CODE, 1959

(Full Structure: Introduction → Meaning → Sections → Rights → Duties → Case Laws → Illustrations → Conclusion)


1. INTRODUCTION

The concept of Bhumiswami is the cornerstone of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC). It signifies the highest category of landholder in the State — essentially the person who enjoys ownership-like rights over agricultural land. Historically, cultivators in different regions held fragmented and insecure land rights under various princely-state laws. MP LRC unified these diverse systems and recognised a single, clear form of landholding known as Bhumiswami.

A Bhumiswami enjoys heritable, transferable, permanent, and secure land rights subject only to the restrictions prescribed by the Code.
Illustration:
If Ram inherits 5 acres of irrigated land from his father and his name appears in the Record of Rights as Bhumiswami, he can sell, mortgage, gift, lease, or divert the land following procedures. No authority may dispossess him except by due legal process. This shows his superior legal position.


2. MEANING & DEFINITION — SECTION 158 MP LRC

Section 158(1) defines Bhumiswami as:

A person who holds land “directly from the State Government” with transferable and heritable rights, and includes persons:

  • who acquired land by transfer,

  • who acquired rights under tenancy laws,

  • who obtained pattas,

  • who became Bhumiswami by statutory conversion.

Nature of the Right

  • Ownership-like right

  • Exclusive possession

  • Permanence (cannot be arbitrarily taken)

  • Freedom of transfer (subject to restrictions)

  • Full heritability

Illustration:
If a tenant under old laws continues cultivation for many years and is converted to Bhumiswami by statute, he automatically “steps into the shoes” of a landowner.


3. HOW BHUMISWAMI RIGHTS ARISE (Section 158 + Related Sections)

A person may become a Bhumiswami through:

1. Inheritance (Sec. 164)

Land passes to legal heirs.

2. Transfer (Sec. 165)

Through sale, gift, mortgage, lease.

3. Statutory Conversion – Section 158(2)

  • Former occupancy tenants

  • Ex-rent-free grantees

  • Old Malgujars, inamdars, etc.

4. Government Allotment

Land allotted under rehabilitation or redistribution schemes.

5. Court Decree or Transfer Deed

Example:
A widow receiving land under government rehabilitation scheme becomes Bhumiswami.


4. RIGHTS OF A BHUMISWAMI (Highly Expanded)

1. Right of Transfer (Sec. 165)

Bhumiswami may:

  • sell land,

  • mortgage,

  • give it in gift,

  • exchange,

  • lease (with limits).

The only major restriction applies to tribal land transfers under Section 170.

Illustration:

Suresh sells 1 acre from his inheritance to raise money for his daughter’s education — legally valid.


2. Right to Diversion (Sec. 172–175)

Change land use from agricultural to:

  • residential,

  • commercial,

  • industrial,

  • educational.

Permission of Collector required.

Example:
Bhumiswami wants to convert his roadside field into a petrol pump — must apply for diversion.


3. Right to Partition (Sec. 178)

Co-sharers may seek partition before Tehsildar.

4. Right to Defence Against Unlawful Dispossession (Sec. 250)

Any illegal eviction may be reversed by the Tehsildar.

5. Right to compensation for acquisition

Full compensation when land acquired for public purpose.


5. DUTIES / LIABILITIES OF BHUMISWAMI

1. Payment of Land Revenue (Sec. 57–82)

Mandatory.

2. Restrictions on transfer of Tribal Land (Sec. 170 & 170-B)

Cannot transfer to non-tribal without Collector’s permission.

3. Maintaining Boundary Marks (Sec. 129)

Liable if boundaries damaged due to negligence.

4. Protection of land productivity

Cannot cause degradation or illegal diversion.


6. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Mansaram v. SDO, MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines)

In this case, Mansaram cultivated land for decades and claimed he should be recorded as Bhumiswami since his ancestors were occupancy tenants. The Tehsildar refused and recorded him as tenant-at-will. In appeal, SDO upheld order without examining old Khasra entries. Mansaram approached High Court producing earlier settlement records showing hereditary cultivation.

Judgment

Court directed authorities to recognise him as Bhumiswami under Section 158(2).

Significance

Establishes that long-standing occupancy tenants are entitled to conversion into Bhumiswami.


2. Balram v. Board of Revenue, MBLR

Facts

Balram gifted his agricultural land to his nephew. Collector questioned validity because donor was tribal and transferee was non-tribal.

Judgment

Board held that tribal Bhumiswami needs prior permission for transfer under Section 170.

Significance

Confirms restrictions on tribal land transfers.


7. ILLUSTRATIONS

1. Conversion Example

A former government lessee whose lease expires and is converted to ownership becomes Bhumiswami.

2. Mutation Example

On father’s death, daughter becomes Bhumiswami and mutation follows in her name.


8. CONCLUSION

Bhumiswami is the highest form of land right under MP LRC. It ensures security, transferability, heritability, and access to legal protections. The statutory framework under Section 158 and related provisions centralises landholding into a clear, uniform system that protects cultivators while allowing regulated land transactions.


  1. Right of Transfer, Forfeiture, lease, set aside of transfer, Reversion of land of members of aboriginal tribes, Diversion of land, Relinquishment, abandonment, disposal and partition of holding.

1. INTRODUCTION

The Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC) regulates the entire life-cycle of land ownership — from acquisition, to transfer, to forfeiture, to diversion, to disposal, to partition. These provisions determine how a Bhumiswami may deal with his land, what restrictions apply, when State intervention is allowed, and how community interests (especially tribal rights) are protected.

In a rural agrarian state like Madhya Pradesh, these provisions become crucial in preventing illegal dispossession, protecting vulnerable communities, enabling orderly land use, and ensuring efficient land administration.

Illustration:
If a Bhumiswami sells land to a non-tribal in a Scheduled Tribe area without permission, the transfer may be set aside and the land restored. If a landowner abandons his holding, the State resumes it. If co-sharers disagree on cultivation, they seek partition. These events show how diverse the legal mechanisms are.


2. RIGHT OF TRANSFER — SECTION 165

A Bhumiswami has the right to transfer his land through:

  • Sale,

  • Gift,

  • Exchange,

  • Mortgage,

  • Lease (with restrictions),

  • Will (bequest).

Conditions:

  1. Transfer must be for consideration (except gift).

  2. Transfer must comply with the Transfer of Property Act.

  3. Transfer cannot violate tribal protection laws (Sec. 170).

  4. Transfer cannot defeat tenancy rights.

Illustration:
Ratan, a Bhumiswami, may sell 2 acres to another agriculturist. But if he is a tribal, he requires Collector’s permission.


3. FORFEITURE — SECTION 168 & RELATED PRINCIPLES

Forfeiture refers to loss of rights due to violation of statutory conditions.

Grounds include:

  • unauthorised transfer,

  • misuse of land,

  • breach of conditions in government grants,

  • illegal diversion.

Process:

  • Notice,

  • Explanation opportunity,

  • Order by Collector.

Example:
If land allotted to a landless person is transferred within the restricted period, Collector may forfeit and resume the land.


4. LEASE BY BHUMISWAMI — SECTION 168

A Bhumiswami may lease land, but subject to restrictions:

  1. Lease cannot exceed prescribed period.

  2. Written lease preferred.

  3. Tribal Bhumiswami cannot lease to non-tribal without permission.

  4. Land for commercial/industrial use requires diversion.

Illustration:
Bhumiswami leasing 1 hectare for onion farming for two years is permissible.


5. SET ASIDE OF TRANSFER — SECTION 170 & 170-B

These are protective provisions for Scheduled Tribes.

Section 170 – Transfers without Permission

If a tribal Bhumiswami transfers land without Collector’s prior permission, the transfer is voidable.

Collector may:

  • set aside transfer,

  • restore land to tribal transferor/heirs.

Section 170-B – Inquiry into Past Transfers

The authority reviews all past transfers involving tribal land to detect illegal ones.

Illustration:
If a tribal sold land in 1998 to a non-tribal without permission, Collector may restore it even today under 170-B.


6. REVERSION OF LAND OF ABORIGINAL TRIBES — SECTION 170 & 170-A

Purpose:

  • prevent exploitation of tribal communities,

  • stop land alienation,

  • maintain socio-economic stability.

When an illegal transfer is detected:

  • Land reverts to original tribal owner,

  • Compensation may be refunded to transferee,

  • Tribal resettled into possession.

Case Example:
Tribal land purchased by moneylenders was restored under 170-B after inquiry.


7. DIVERSION OF LAND — SECTIONS 172–175

Diversion means changing land use from agricultural to:

  • Residential

  • Commercial

  • Industrial

  • Educational

  • Warehousing, etc.

Procedure:

  1. Application to Collector (Sec. 172)

  2. Notice to neighbors

  3. Inquiry

  4. Diversion premium assessment

  5. Order of permission

Illustration:

Bhumiswami converting land to a petrol pump site must obtain diversion; failure results in penalty under Section 248.


8. RELINQUISHMENT — SECTION 174

Relinquishment = voluntary surrender of land to the State.

Rules:

  • Must be done before harvesting season.

  • Must be in writing before Tehsildar.

  • State becomes Bhumiswami after acceptance.

Example:
A widow unable to cultivate her 1 acre may relinquish land and the State will redistribute it.


9. ABANDONMENT — SECTION 177

Abandonment occurs when Bhumiswami:

  • leaves land uncultivated,

  • shows intention not to return,

  • leaves without paying revenue.

Procedure:

  • Revenue officer issues notice.

  • After inquiry, land resumes to State.

Illustration:
Migrating permanently to another State and leaving land unused for years may amount to abandonment.


10. DISPOSAL OF HOLDING — SECTION 180 & RELATED RULES

After relinquishment, abandonment, forfeiture or resumption, State may dispose land by:

  • Granting patta to landless persons,

  • Auction for public purpose,

  • Allotment to cooperative societies,

  • Allotment to displaced persons.

Example:
Relinquished land is allotted to a landless agricultural labourer.


11. PARTITION OF HOLDING — SECTION 178

Partition = division of joint holding among co-sharers.

Authority:

Tehsildar decides partition.

Procedure:

  1. Application by co-sharer

  2. Notice to all parties

  3. Measurement & demarcation

  4. Passing partition order

  5. Mutation entries updated

Partition must:

  • ensure fairness,

  • maintain compactness,

  • avoid unnecessary fragmentation.

Illustration:
If three brothers jointly inherit 9 acres, Tehsildar may divide into 3 plots of equal fertility.


12. IMPORTANT CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Kushal Singh v. State of M.P. MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines)

Kushal Singh, a tribal, sold his land to a non-tribal in 1995. No permission was taken. In 2008, the Collector initiated inquiry under Section 170-B. Purchaser argued that long delay and development on land should stop restoration. Documents showed clear exploitation and undervaluation.

Judgment

High Court held that Section 170-B is a social protective provision and delay does not defeat its purpose. Land restored to tribal.

Significance

Reinforced stringent protection of tribal land.


2. Harishankar v. Board of Revenue MBLR

Facts

Bhumiswami converted land into a brick kiln without diversion under Section 172. Penalty imposed. He argued agricultural land can be temporarily used for kiln.

Judgment

Board held diversion is mandatory even for temporary non-agricultural use.

Significance

Confirms strict application of diversion laws.


3. Ramlal v. SDO, Seoni

Facts

Co-sharer claimed partition was unfair as fertile portion given to another. Tehsildar ignored field map.

Judgment

SDO ordered fresh partition ensuring equality.

Significance

Partition must consider fertility and utility.


13. CONCLUSION

The MP LRC provides a comprehensive framework regulating transfer, forfeiture, lease, reversal of illegal tribal transfers, diversion, relinquishment, abandonment, disposal and partition. These provisions protect vulnerable communities, ensure rational land use, and maintain public order in land administration.


  1. Occupancy Tenants.

1. INTRODUCTION

Before the enactment of the MP Land Revenue Code, 1959, cultivators across Madhya Pradesh held land under diverse tenure systems—ryotwari holdings, malguzari tenancy, protected tenure, and occupancy tenancy. To bring uniformity and eliminate feudal exploitation, the Code consolidated all such tenures and classified certain cultivators as Occupancy Tenants.

Occupancy tenants represent a protected class of cultivators who enjoy security of tenure, heritable rights, limited transferability, and the possibility of becoming Bhumiswami through statutory conversion. They act as a bridge between tenants-at-will and full owners (Bhumiswami).

Illustration:
If Hari Lal cultivates the same land for decades with fixed rent payments and his name appears in khasra as an occupancy tenant, he cannot be evicted arbitrarily. He enjoys rights close to that of a permanent tenant with strong protection under the Code.


2. STATUTORY BASIS — SECTION 185 & RELATED PROVISIONS

Occupancy tenancy is dealt with under:

  • Section 185 → Definition of occupancy tenant

  • Section 189 → Rights of occupancy tenants

  • Section 190 → liabilities

  • Section 191 → Restrictions on transfer

  • Section 192 → Succession/Heritability

  • Section 193–195 → Ejectment & protection

  • Section 158(2) → Conversion into Bhumiswami


3. DEFINITION OF OCCUPANCY TENANT — SECTION 185

A person is an occupancy tenant if:

  1. He holds land from a Bhumiswami on fixed rent;

  2. He has a right of occupancy under the Code;

  3. He has been cultivating for a prescribed minimum period;

  4. His rights are heritable but not fully transferable;

  5. His name appears in the Record of Rights as an occupancy tenant.

Nature of Tenure

  • Secure

  • Heritable

  • Enjoys long possession

  • Protected from eviction except by due process


4. CHARACTERISTICS / ESSENTIAL FEATURES

1. Heritable Right — Section 192

Land passes to legal heirs (Class I heirs).

2. Security of Tenure

Cannot be evicted except:

  • for arrears of rent,

  • for breach of conditions,

  • by order under Sections 193–195.

3. Limited Transferability (Sec. 191)

Occupancy tenant cannot:

  • sell,

  • gift,

  • mortgage,

  • sub-lease
    without permission of landlord and authority.

4. Pay Fixed Rent

Rent is fixed and cannot be increased arbitrarily.

5. Cannot be evicted except by lawful process

Eviction requires:

  • notice,

  • grounds,

  • order by competent revenue authority.

Illustration:

If Suresh is an occupancy tenant and landlord tries to forcibly remove him, Suresh may apply under Section 250 for restoring possession.


5. HOW OCCUPANCY TENANCY ARISES

1. Long-standing cultivation under previous laws

Tenants cultivating continuously for many years automatically became occupancy tenants.

2. Contractual creation

Landlord may create occupancy rights through a registered lease.

3. Statutory deeming under Section 185

Certain classes automatically became occupancy tenants after 1959.

4. Conversion from tenant-at-will

After continuous possession + rent payment.


6. RIGHTS OF OCCUPANCY TENANTS — SECTION 189

  1. Right to possession (strong protection).

  2. Right to use land for agricultural purpose.

  3. Right to improvements (wells, bunds, trees).

  4. Right to pass tenancy to heirs.

  5. Right to fair rent.

  6. Right to purchase into Bhumiswami when permitted.

  7. Right to seek protection from unlawful eviction.


7. LIABILITIES — SECTION 190

  1. Pay rent regularly.

  2. Maintain land fertility.

  3. No illegal crop change if restricted.

  4. Comply with lease terms.

  5. Do not encroach beyond tenancy boundary.


8. RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER — SECTION 191

An occupancy tenant cannot transfer tenancy rights except:

  • with landlord’s consent,

  • by inheritance,

  • with permission of revenue authority.

Unauthorized transfer → eviction + fine.

Illustration:
If an occupancy tenant gifts land to a friend without consent, transfer is invalid.


9. EJECTMENT OF OCCUPANCY TENANT — SECTIONS 193–195

Grounds:

  1. Non-payment of rent.

  2. Breach of conditions.

  3. Using land for non-agricultural purposes.

  4. Sub-letting without permission.

Procedure

  1. Notice of demand.

  2. Hearing by Tehsildar.

  3. Order of ejectment.

  4. Appeal to SDO.

Illustration:
If tenant builds a shop on agricultural land without diversion, landlord may seek ejectment.


10. CONVERSION INTO BHUMISWAMI — SECTION 158(2)

Many occupancy tenants became Bhumiswami when:

  • they fulfilled statutory conditions,

  • they paid rent regularly,

  • they cultivated continuously,

  • the Code recognized hereditary tenancy.

Example:
Occupancy tenant cultivating from 1930 became Bhumiswami after MP LRC came into force.


11. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Nahar Singh v. Board of Revenue, M.P. MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines)

Nahar Singh cultivated land as occupancy tenant for over 40 years. Landlord attempted to eject him claiming breach of a supposed oral condition. Tehsildar ordered ejectment. SDO affirmed. Collector dismissed appeal. High Court examined documentary evidence like old khasra entries and rent receipts showing continuous lawful cultivation.

Judgment

Court held occupancy tenant cannot be evicted without specific and proven breach. Order quashed.

Significance

Strong protection is given to occupancy tenants.


2. Bajranglal v. SDO, Mandsaur

Facts

Occupancy tenant sold part of land without landlord’s permission. SDO cancelled transfer and initiated ejectment proceedings.

Judgment

Board upheld SDO’s decision because Section 191 prohibits transfer without permission.

Significance

Transfer restrictions are strictly enforced.


3. Gulab Bai v. State of M.P. MBLR

Facts

Widow cultivating as occupancy tenant sought conversion into Bhumiswami. Revenue authorities refused citing missing rent receipts.

Judgment

Board held that continuous possession + revenue entries create presumption in her favour.

Significance

Eases conversion into Bhumiswami where long possession exists.


12. ILLUSTRATIONS

Example 1 — Heritable

On death of occupancy tenant, daughter inherits tenancy.

Example 2 — Protected from Eviction

Landlord must follow Sections 193–195; cannot throw tenant out privately.

Example 3 — Misuse Leads to Ejectment

Tenant converting field into brick kiln without permission.


13. CONCLUSION

Occupancy tenants under MP LRC constitute a protected category of cultivators with secure, heritable, but limitedly transferable rights. Their tenure plays a crucial role in rural land stability. Although not full owners, they enjoy substantial protection and may become Bhumiswami through statutory conversion.

Unit – IV Government lessee and service land rights and liabilities of Government lessee

  1. Government lease – Appointment, Termination of lease, Service Land.

1. INTRODUCTION

Government leases under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC) constitute a special category of land allotment where the State, as paramount owner of all land (Sec. 57), grants temporary rights of occupation for specific purposes such as cultivation, service tenure, public utility, rehabilitation, and grazing. These leases do not create ownership but confer limited, conditional, and revocable rights.
Service land (also called “Sewa Bhumi”) is an allied concept where land is given to a person in return for public or village service.

Illustration:
If the State grants a school chowkidar a piece of land to maintain the school premises, this is a service land. Similarly, land allotted to a displaced flood victim for 5 years is a government lease.


2. STATUTORY BASIS

Key provisions:

  • Section 181–184 – Government leases

  • Section 57 – Ownership of all lands vests in State

  • Section 182 – Terms and conditions of lease

  • Section 183 – Termination of lease

  • Section 184 – Restrictions on transfer of leasehold land

  • Service land concepts appear in village administration chapters

  • Rules framed under M.P. Land Revenue Code for lease conditions


3. MEANING OF GOVERNMENT LEASE

A government lease is:

  • temporary occupation of government land,

  • granted to individuals, institutions, or communities,

  • for agricultural or non-agricultural use,

  • on conditions fixed by Collector.

Leased land never becomes Bhumiswami land, unless specifically converted.


4. APPOINTMENT / GRANT OF GOVERNMENT LEASE — SECTION 181–182

1. Authority to Grant Lease

  • Collector is the primary authority.

  • Subordinate officers may act under delegation.

2. Purposes for Which Lease Can Be Granted

  • agricultural use

  • housing for poor or landless persons

  • grazing (charnoi land)

  • school, Panchayat, anganwadi

  • industrial or commercial use after diversion

  • rehabilitation of displaced persons

  • religious/charitable institutions

3. Procedure for Granting Lease

  1. Application by interested person

  2. Site inspection by Revenue Inspector/Patwari

  3. Verification of eligibility

  4. Fixation of premium/rent

  5. Issue of patta/lease deed

  6. Entry in land records

4. Duration of Lease

  • usually 5–30 years,

  • extendable on compliance.

Illustration:

A landless labourer receives 2 acres of government land on a 5-year lease for subsistence cultivation.


5. TERMS & CONDITIONS OF LEASE (Sec. 182)

Leases always include:

  • payment of rent,

  • proper use of land,

  • prohibition on transfer,

  • prohibition on misuse,

  • condition of resumption for public purpose,

  • condition of maintaining boundaries,

  • compliance with revenue laws.

Example:
If land leased for cultivation is used for a brick kiln, it violates terms.


6. TERMINATION OF LEASE — SECTION 183

Grounds:

1. Breach of Conditions

Misuse or violation of terms → lease cancelled.

2. Non-payment of rent

Persistent default allows termination.

3. Unauthorized transfer

Leasehold land cannot be sold, gifted, mortgaged → void transfer leads to cancellation.

4. Requirement for public purpose

Government may resume land for public use.

5. Fraud or misrepresentation

If lease obtained by false documents.

6. Abandonment

Leaving land uncultivated for long periods.

Procedure for Termination

  1. Notice

  2. Hearing

  3. Collector’s cancellation order

  4. Taking possession

  5. Updating land records

Illustration:

A man leasing land for agriculture converts it into a warehouse without diversion → Collector terminates lease.


7. SERVICE LAND (SEWA BHUMI)

Service land is land given to village servants in exchange for duties.

Examples of Service Holders

  • Kotwar

  • Chowkidar

  • Barber (historically)

  • Waterman

  • Patel (earlier system)

Characteristics of Service Land

  • not transferable

  • co-terminous with service

  • reverts to State on cessation of service

  • no ownership rights

  • rent may be exempted as part of service compensation

Illustration:
When a Kotwar retires, the land given to him as service tenure automatically reverts to the State.


8. RIGHTS OF GOVERNMENT LESSEE

  • Right of possession

  • Right to use for permitted purpose

  • Right to protection from arbitrary eviction

  • Right to renewal (case-by-case)

  • Right to compensation for improvements in some cases


9. LIABILITIES OF GOVERNMENT LESSEE

  • No right to transfer

  • Must use land only for stated purpose

  • Must pay rent

  • Must maintain land productivity

  • Must follow revenue rules


10. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Ramdayal v. Collector, Chhindwara (MPHC)

Facts (8–10 lines)

Ramdayal received 1 acre government land for cultivation on a 10-year lease. He constructed a brick kiln without diversion permission. Collector terminated lease. Ramdayal argued kiln was temporary and improved land value. Evidence showed repeated misuse despite notices.

Judgment

High Court upheld cancellation. Breach of lease conditions justifies termination under Section 183.

Significance

Misuse = valid ground for termination.


2. Sitaram Kotwar v. State of M.P., MBLR

Facts

Kotwar retired and refused to vacate service land claiming long possession. Patwari record showed land was service tenure.

Judgment

Court held service land is not heritable; must revert to Government.

Significance

Service land is inseparable from service; no ownership arises.


3. Gabbarsingh v. Collector, Rewa

Facts

Lessee transferred land to cousin by unregistered deed. Collector cancelled lease and resumed land.

Judgment

Leasehold right is non-transferable unless expressly permitted.

Significance

Ensures discipline in government land management.


11. CONCLUSION

Government leases under MP LRC are tightly regulated temporary rights. Their purpose is welfare-oriented and administrative, not ownership. Termination is justified for breach, misuse, unauthorized transfer, or public purpose. Service land reinforces traditional village administration, remaining strictly non-transferable and linked to service.

  1. Alluvion and Deluvion.

1. INTRODUCTION

Alluvion and Diluvion are ancient land law concepts related to natural changes in the course of a river and their impact on land rights. These phenomena are particularly relevant in Madhya Pradesh where major rivers like Narmada, Chambal, Betwa, Ken, Son and Tapti frequently change course due to floods, erosion, and sedimentation.

The MP Land Revenue Code, 1959 incorporates these long-established doctrines to determine who owns land added or lost due to natural river action, how revenue records should be altered, and how rights of cultivators should be protected.

Illustration:
If a farmer’s field gains new soil sediment after a flood, he may acquire rights over the newly formed land. Conversely, if a part of his land is washed away, he loses possession temporarily but may recover it if river retreats naturally.


2. STATUTORY BASIS UNDER MP LRC

The Code itself does not contain separate sections titled “alluvion” or “diluvion”, but the concepts are enforced through:

  • Section 57: State ownership of all lands

  • Section 104–110: Land records, survey and changes

  • Revenue Rules on boundary demarcation & river changes

  • Indian Easements Act & General Land Law (Common Law principles)

Courts have repeatedly held that general principles of alluvion/diluvion apply unless excluded by statute.


3. MEANING OF ALLUVION

Alluvion means:

  • Gradual and imperceptible addition of soil to land

  • Caused by natural action of water, especially rivers

  • Adding to the land of the riparian (river-bank) owner

Key characteristics:

  1. Must be gradual,

  2. Must be natural,

  3. Must be imperceptible (not sudden).

Legal Effect

The land slowly added becomes part of the holding of the owner whose land it attaches to.

Illustration:
If 20 feet of new fertile soil deposits on the bank of Ramesh’s field over months, that land becomes his.


4. MEANING OF DILUVION

Diluvion means:

  • Gradual erosion or washing away of land

  • Due to natural river action

  • Riparian owner temporarily loses land

Legal Effect

Ownership is not lost permanently—if the river recedes naturally, the owner regains the land.

Illustration:
If 1 acre of Shyamlal’s land erodes during monsoon but reappears next year when river retreats, Shyamlal becomes owner again.


5. PRINCIPLES APPLIED BY REVENUE AUTHORITIES

1. Gradual change = owner gains or loses automatically

This is alluvion or diluvion.

2. Sudden change (avulsion) = boundaries remain same

If river suddenly shifts course overnight, ownership does not change.

3. Survey authorities must update records only after physical verification

Under Sections 104–110, Patwari & Revenue Inspector record gains/losses.

4. No premium charged for alluvial land

Because land comes by natural process.

5. Boundaries follow the river

In alluvion/diluvion cases, boundary moves with the gradual course of river.


6. DISTINCTION: ALLUVION vs AVULSION

ConceptMeaningOwnership Result
AlluvionGradual additionOwner gains automatically
DiluvionGradual lossOwner regains if land reappears
AvulsionSudden shift in riverBoundaries do NOT change

Illustration:
A flood washing away 3 acres instantly = avulsion → title remains unchanged.


7. POWERS OF REVENUE OFFICERS

Under MP LRC:

1. Demarcation (Sec. 129–134)

Tehsildar demarcates altered holdings.

2. Correction of Land Records

Patwari updates khasra, map, ROR entries.

3. Assessment of Revenue

Collector re-assesses land revenue if holding increases/decreases.

4. Settling boundary disputes

SDO/Collector adjudicate disputes arising due to river shifts.


8. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. State of M.P. v. Ghanshyam Patel, MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines)

Ghanshyam Patel’s land on the bank of Narmada gained about 0.60 acre due to gradual deposition of soil over 3 years. Patwari refused to enter the change, claiming the land belonged to the State. Ghanshyam approached SDO. On inspection, change was found gradual. State appealed arguing ownership lies with State because river land is public land.

Judgment

High Court held that alluvial accretions belong to riparian owner unless statute states otherwise.

Significance

Confirms private ownership of alluvial gains.


2. Mannu Singh v. Board of Revenue, MBLR

Facts

Land washed away from Mannu Singh’s holding during heavy rains. After two years, land reappeared. Patwari refused restoration claiming land now vested in State.

Judgment

Board held that in diluvion, original owner regains land when river recedes.

Significance

Protects riparian owners from permanent loss.


3. Ramratan v. Jamna Prasad (MPHC)

Facts

River shifted suddenly overnight due to major flood. Neighbor claimed new river course shifted boundary.

Judgment

Court held sudden change = avulsion → land boundaries remain same.

Significance

Clarifies distinction: sudden vs gradual change.


9. ILLUSTRATIONS

1. Alluvion Example

A river deposits soil and widens Shanti's field slowly → becomes her land.

2. Diluvion Example

Rahul’s land submerged for 2 years → reappears → revenue authorities restore his name.

3. Sudden Flood (Avulsion)

River shifts 200 meters overnight → title does not change.


10. OBJECTIVES

  • Fairness to riparian owners

  • Certainty in boundaries

  • Protection from natural calamities

  • Updating of land records

  • Avoiding disputes among neighbors

  • Enabling proper land revenue assessment


11. CONCLUSION

Alluvion and diluvion remain vital doctrines governing natural changes in riverine lands under the MP LRC framework. They ensure that land gained or lost gradually due to natural causes is handled fairly, restoring or awarding rights based on time-tested principles of justice and equity. Revenue authorities must update records meticulously to reflect these changes.

  1. Consolidation of Holding.

1. INTRODUCTION

Agricultural holdings in India traditionally suffer from fragmentation due to inheritance, sale of small parcels, and repeated subdivision over generations. Fragmented holdings reduce agricultural productivity, increase cost of cultivation, restrict use of machinery, and cause boundary disputes.

To remedy this, the legislature introduced Consolidation of Holdings, a process by which scattered agricultural parcels belonging to a single cultivator are rearranged into compact, contiguous, economically viable blocks.

In Madhya Pradesh, consolidation is governed by:

  • the MP Land Revenue Code (general powers),

  • special laws (such as MP Consolidation of Holdings Act),

  • revenue rules and notifications.

Illustration:
If a farmer has 5 small plots scattered across 4 villages, consolidation may give him one compact block, reducing wastage of time, labour, and boundary conflicts.


2. STATUTORY BASIS

Under MP Land Revenue Code:

  • Chapter on land records & survey (Sections 104–112) — used for rearrangement

  • Section 129–134 — demarcation powers

  • Section 178 — partition principles applied in consolidation

  • General powers of Collector/State Government

Under Special Consolidation Acts:

  • MP Consolidation of Holdings Act (in applicable areas)

  • Notifications by State Government for specific districts


3. MEANING OF CONSOLIDATION

Consolidation means:

  • reorganising fragmented land holdings,

  • pooling scattered plots,

  • reallotting compact blocks,

  • ensuring equal value/fertility distribution.

It is a land management reform ensuring economic stability and reducing disputes.


4. NEED FOR CONSOLIDATION

  1. Extremely fragmented fields

  2. High boundary disputes

  3. Wastage of land in bunds and paths

  4. Difficult to use tractors/machinery

  5. Heavy cost of irrigation

  6. Unequal distribution of soil fertility

  7. Time lost in travelling between plots

Illustration:
A farmer with multiple tiny plots spends more time walking between fields than cultivating.


5. OBJECTIVES OF CONSOLIDATION

  • To improve productivity

  • To prevent fragmentation

  • To facilitate modern farming

  • To reduce litigation

  • To ensure fair land distribution

  • To preserve fertility balance

  • To create clear boundaries

  • To promote economic holdings


6. AUTHORITIES INVOLVED

Usually includes:

  • Consolidation Officer

  • Assistant Consolidation Officer

  • Settlement Officer

  • Collector

  • Survey Superintendent

  • Revenue Inspector & Patwari

These officers jointly plan, inspect, and finalise consolidation schemes.


7. PROCEDURE OF CONSOLIDATION

1. Government Notification

Consolidation begins with notification declaring certain villages “consolidation areas.”

2. Preparation of Maps & Records

Officers prepare:

  • khasra sheets

  • field map (shajra)

  • valuation registers

  • fertility classification

3. Invitation of Claims & Objections

Farmers submit:

  • claims regarding size,

  • objections to entries,

  • rights and liabilities.

**4. Preparation of Provisional Consolidation Scheme

Scheme contains:

  • how plots will be exchanged,

  • land to be allotted for common purposes (roads, ponds).

5. Hearing of Objections

Consolidation Officer hears disputes.

6. Final Consolidation Scheme

Issued after adjustment of all objections.

7. Repartition / Allotment

Farmers receive new compact blocks of land equal in value, not necessarily in area.

8. Demarcation

Boundary stones placed; maps updated.


8. PRINCIPLES FOLLOWED IN CONSOLIDATION

  1. Value, not area, is key
    High-fertility land may be exchanged for a smaller compact piece.

  2. Equality of soil fertility
    Lands of equal quality are allotted.

  3. Economically viable units
    Holdings must be sufficient for mechanised farming.

  4. Road & irrigation access
    Priority for access routes.

  5. Minimising fragmentation
    Objective is to give one or two compact plots only.


9. RIGHTS OF LANDOWNERS IN CONSOLIDATION

  • Right to file objections

  • Right to equivalent land (value-wise)

  • Right to be heard

  • Right to appeal against consolidation scheme

  • Right to compensation for improvements

  • Right to contest valuation


10. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Patiram v. Consolidation Officer, MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines)

Patiram owned five scattered plots of varying fertility. During consolidation, he was allotted one compact block but he claimed the fertility did not match original land. Consolidation officer rejected objections. Appeal dismissed. Patiram approached High Court arguing violation of equality principle.

Judgment

Court held that value-based equality must be ensured. Directed reconsideration of fertility classification.

Significance

Fertility and valuation form core principles of consolidation.


2. Jagdish v. State of M.P., MBLR

Facts

Jagdish alleged he was allotted land without irrigation access after consolidation. Officials claimed irrigation is not guaranteed.

Judgment

Court held that essential access and feasibility must be ensured.

Significance

Access rights are part of equitable consolidation.


3. Rameshwar v. Collector, MPHC

Facts

Question arose whether land allotted under consolidation becomes Bhumiswami.

Judgment

Court held allotment under consolidation carries full Bhumiswami rights unless restricted.

Significance

Ensures security of tenure post-consolidation.


11. ILLUSTRATIONS

Example 1

Farmer with 12 scattered plots gets one single rectangular block after consolidation.

Example 2

Two brothers receive equal-value lands, though different in area.

Example 3

A watercourse is created for new blocks to ensure fair irrigation.


12. LIMITATIONS OF CONSOLIDATION

  • Sometimes reduces area of fertile holdings

  • Resistance from villagers

  • Disputes over valuation

  • Administrative delays

  • Non-acceptance by large landowners


13. CONCLUSION

Consolidation of holding is a vital reform aimed at transforming fragmented agricultural lands into economically viable units. Through detailed surveys, reallocation, fertility assessment, and fair repartition, consolidation enhances agricultural productivity, reduces disputes, and modernises rural land structure in Madhya Pradesh.

  1. Village Officers.

. INTRODUCTION

Village Officers form the lowest but most essential tier of the land revenue administration in Madhya Pradesh. They act as the State’s “eyes and ears” at the grassroots level. Historically, village administration in India included hereditary officers like Patels, Kotwars, Barbers, and Watermen. The MP Land Revenue Code, 1959 modernised the system and legally recognised certain key village officers with precise duties relating to land revenue, records maintenance, law and order assistance, and communication between villagers and higher authorities.

Illustration:
When a flood damages crops, the first officer to verify and report loss is the Patwari/Kotwar at village level. This enables relief and compensation to flow quickly.


2. STATUTORY BASIS

Village officers and their roles are recognised under:

  • MP Land Revenue Code, 1959

  • Rules under MP LRC

  • Executive circulars

  • Special Acts for village policing and administration

The Code does not combine all officers under one chapter but recognises them under various administrative provisions.


3. WHO ARE VILLAGE OFFICERS?

Village Officers include:

  1. Patwari (village accountant)

  2. Kotwar (village watchman)

  3. Patel (village headman—historical; now honorary/local role)

  4. Village Chowkidar

  5. Gram Kotwal

  6. Revenue Inspector (supervises Patwaris)

  7. Other traditional functionaries depending on region

This answer will focus mainly on Patels and Kotwars as you asked for separate answers after this.


4. GENERAL FUNCTIONS OF VILLAGE OFFICERS

  1. Maintaining land records (Patwari)

  2. Assisting revenue officers in surveys, demarcation, measurement

  3. Reporting natural calamities

  4. Assisting in recovery of land revenue

  5. Maintaining village peace and order (Kotwar)

  6. Serving summons/notices from revenue courts

  7. Guarding unoccupied land or government land

  8. Informing government about births, deaths, encroachments, offences

  9. Supporting relief & rehabilitation operations


5. APPOINTMENT

1. By Collector or authorized officer

Village officers are appointed through revenue administration.

2. Qualifications vary

  • Patwari requires qualification, training, and certificate.

  • Kotwar/Patel generally appointed from within village community.

3. Service Conditions

  • Appointed as government servants or honorary servants.

  • Can be removed for misconduct.


6. POWERS OF VILLAGE OFFICERS

Patwari

  • Prepare khasra, khatauni, crop statements, maps

  • Update mutation records (initial stage)

  • Keep watch over encroachments

  • Verify possession in land disputes

  • Assist Tehsildar in demarcation

  • Measure land

  • Maintain village statistics

Kotwar

  • Maintain peace & safety

  • Provide watch and ward

  • Report crimes, unnatural deaths, suspicious movement

  • Prevent and report encroachments

  • Assist in recovery of revenue

  • Serve notices and summon villagers

  • Act as informer for government

Patel

  • Traditional village headman

  • Supervisor in village disputes

  • Representative of villagers to revenue officials

  • Performs assistance duties similar to Kotwar in some areas


7. DUTIES OF VILLAGE OFFICERS (Highly Detailed)

1. Assistance in Revenue Collection

  • Inform farmers about payment dates

  • Identify defaulters

  • Help Collector/Tehsildar in recovery

2. Land Records Maintenance

  • Report changes in ownership (death, inheritance)

  • Report crop conditions

  • Maintain daily diary of events

  • Note encroachments on government land

3. Community & Public Duties

  • Assist in census

  • Disaster response

  • Public health drives

  • Fire reporting

  • Water distribution maintenance

4. Judicial Assistance

  • Serve summons from revenue courts

  • Ensure presence of witnesses

  • Identify boundaries in disputes

5. Law & Order Support (Kotwar)

  • Report crimes or suspicious activity

  • Patrol village boundaries

  • Assist police in minor arrests or searches


8. REMOVAL & DISCIPLINARY ACTION

Grounds:

  • Negligence of duty

  • Misuse of power

  • Collusion in illegal land transfer

  • Failure to report encroachment

  • Misreporting crop damage

  • Dishonesty

Collector may remove, suspend, or fine village officers.


9. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Harvilas Patwari v. State of M.P., MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines)

Harvilas, a Patwari, was removed for failing to record encroachment on government land for three years. Inquiry revealed he was aware of illegal construction but did not report it. He argued minor delay should not lead to dismissal.

Judgment

High Court upheld removal, noting Patwari’s duties are crucial for land protection.

Significance

Patwari must vigilantly protect government land.


2. Pukaram Kotwar v. Collector, Mandla

Facts

Kotwar failed to report thefts and suspicious activities despite complaints. Inquiry found repeated negligence.

Judgment

Collector’s removal order upheld.

Significance

Kotwar plays key role in village security.


3. Malu Patel v. State, MBLR

Facts

Patel failed to inform authorities about massive crop damage in time, delaying compensation.

Judgment

Court held Patel has public duty to report calamities promptly.

Significance

Village officers serve as first responders.


10. ILLUSTRATIONS

1. Encroachment Case

Kotwar sees someone occupying government land → reports to Tehsildar → inspection done.

2. Mutation Event

Patwari updates field-book after death of Bhumiswami → mutation initiated.

3. Crime Alert

Kotwar reports gang movement → police take preventive action.


11. CONCLUSION

Village officers are critical functionaries connecting rural communities with the revenue administration. Their duties in land records, security, revenue collection, and public information form the foundation of effective rural governance under the MP LRC. Their vigilance and integrity ensure that the entire system works smoothly from village level to the State.

  1. Patels.

1. INTRODUCTION

The “Patel” is one of the oldest village-level institutions in Central India, functioning historically as the village headman, intermediary, administrator, and representative of community interests. Although modern statutory authority has reduced his traditional dominance, the role of the Patel still exists in many parts of Madhya Pradesh in a modified, semi-administrative, and community-assistance capacity under the revenue framework.

Patels act as the bridge between rural residents and the higher revenue authorities (Patwari, Revenue Inspector, Tehsildar, Collector). Their role focuses on coordination, public communication, supervision of village records, maintenance of order, and support in revenue processes.


2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

  • During pre-British and British periods, Patels were hereditary officers.

  • They were responsible for village management, revenue collection, and dispute resolution.

  • After independence and abolition of zamindari systems, Patels ceased to be hereditary authorities.

  • The MP Land Revenue Code abolished feudal powers but retained certain administrative functions.

Illustration:
Earlier the Patel’s house served as the village office (chaupal). Today the Patel assists modern revenue officials instead of wielding direct authority.


3. STATUTORY BASIS

The MP Land Revenue Code, 1959 does not consolidate all duties of Patel in a single section but recognizes him as:

  • a village officer,

  • functioning under the Collector/SDO/Tehsildar,

  • with duties prescribed by rules, circulars, and revenue instructions.

He works alongside the Patwari, Kotwar and Panchayat officials.


4. APPOINTMENT OF PATEL

1. Appointing Authority

  • Collector or delegated SDO/Tehsildar.

2. Method of Appointment

  • Selected from respected persons of the village.

  • Non-hereditary appointment.

  • Preference to persons with integrity and influence.

3. Qualifications

  • Good character

  • Basic literacy

  • Understanding of village customs

  • Familiarity with agricultural practices

4. Tenure

  • Generally permanent until removal for misconduct.


5. POWERS OF THE PATEL

Patels are not judicial or revenue officers; they have assisting and supervisory powers.

1. Supervisory Power Over Village Administration

Monitors functioning of Patwari, Kotwar, and community services.

2. Advisory Power

Advises revenue authorities about village conditions.

3. Community Leadership

Represents villagers before the government.

4. Land Management Support

Informs authorities about:

  • land disputes,

  • boundary issues,

  • illegal encroachments,

  • crop conditions.

5. Public Order Assistance

Helps maintain peace and supports police/Kotwar during emergencies.

6. Disaster Response Role

Coordinates relief after flood, drought, fire, or epidemics.


6. DUTIES OF THE PATEL (DETAILED)

1. Revenue Duties

  • Notify villagers about revenue collection.

  • Ensure public gatherings for revenue announcements.

  • Assist in measurement and demarcation of fields.

2. Maintenance of Public Records

  • Verify correctness of khasra entries submitted by Patwari.

  • Report discrepancies to Tehsildar.

3. Reporting Duties

He must promptly report:

  • births & deaths,

  • outbreak of diseases,

  • crop diseases,

  • calamities,

  • illegal tree cutting,

  • water shortages,

  • encroachments on government land.

4. Public Welfare Duties

  • Help in vaccination campaigns.

  • Coordinate panchayat meetings.

  • Assist in distribution of government benefits.

5. Judicial Assistance

  • Help serve summons issued by revenue courts.

  • Identify witnesses and parties in disputes.

Illustration:
If a boundary dispute breaks out between farmers, Patel immediately informs Patwari and Tehsildar and prevents escalation.


7. LIABILITIES OF PATEL

Patel may face disciplinary action for:

  1. Negligence in reporting offences

  2. Collusion with illegal encroachers

  3. Misrepresentation of crop records

  4. Participating in illegal tree cutting

  5. Helping in fraudulent transfers

  6. Political misuse of influence

  7. Corruption

Penalties include:

  • suspension,

  • dismissal,

  • fines,

  • prosecution (in grave cases).


8. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. State of M.P. v. Ramlal Patel, MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines)

Ramlal Patel was accused of failing to report crop damage due to floods. Villagers alleged that he knowingly suppressed information, delaying compensation. Inquiry showed he did not forward Patwari’s report for 21 days.

Judgment

High Court upheld action against him, stating Patels have essential public responsibility.

Significance

Negligence in disaster reporting is grave misconduct.


2. Chhotelal Patel v. Collector, MBLR

Facts

Chhotelal supported illegal construction on grazing land and refused to report encroachment.

Judgment

Collector removed him from service.

Significance

Patel must protect government land.


3. Srichand Patel v. State, MPHC

Facts

Patel failed to assist police during communal tension in village.

Judgment

Court held Patel has obligatory duty to maintain peace.

Significance

Patel is part of local law-and-order structure.


9. ILLUSTRATIONS

1. Public Health Case

Patel informs health officers about malaria outbreak → rapid action taken.

2. Boundary Dispute

Patel notices quarrel between farmers about field bund → alerts Patwari → dispute settled peacefully.

3. Encroachment

Patel reports illegal fencing on government land → Tehsildar acts.


10. CONCLUSION

The Patel remains a vital component of village administration in Madhya Pradesh — a facilitator, coordinator, informant, and representative. Though his formal statutory authority is limited, the Patel’s role in maintaining records, reporting events, supporting revenue administration, and ensuring smooth village functioning makes him indispensable in rural governance.


  1. Kotwars.

    Kotwars under the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue System

    (20-mark structure: introduction → historical origin → statutory basis → appointment → powers → duties → liabilities → case laws → illustrations → conclusion)


    1. INTRODUCTION

    The Kotwar is one of the most indispensable village-level officers in Madhya Pradesh. Historically known as the village watchman, he is responsible for maintaining law and order, safeguarding government property, providing vital information to revenue officials, and serving as the primary link between villagers and authorities.

    Although not a judicial or revenue officer, the Kotwar’s role is fundamental to the enforcement of the MP Land Revenue Code and rural administration. He handles real-time ground information—encroachments, crimes, boundaries, deaths, calamities—making him the “eyes and ears” of the State in the village.

    Illustration:
    If a farmer illegally occupies government land at night, or a suspicious group arrives in the village, the first person to know and report is the Kotwar.


    2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

    • The Kotwar system dates back to pre-colonial times.

    • Kotwars were hereditary village sentinels responsible for protecting crops and warning villagers of attacks.

    • During the British period, they assisted police and revenue authorities.

    • After independence, their hereditary privileges reduced, but their administrative role was retained.


    3. STATUTORY BASIS

    Kotwars are:

    • Recognised as village officers within the MP Land Revenue administrative framework.

    • Governed by MP Land Revenue Code, various rules, circulars, and district-level instructions.

    • Assigned duties relating to law and order, land protection, revenue collection, and information reporting.


    4. APPOINTMENT OF KOTWAR

    1. Appointing Authority

    • Usually the Collector, or delegated authority.

    2. Eligibility

    • Resident of the village

    • Physically fit

    • Of good character

    • Familiar with village geography and population

    3. Tenure

    • Generally permanent, unless removed for misconduct.

    4. Nature of Service

    • Considered village servant

    • May hold service land (sewa bhumi) in lieu of wages

    • Non-transferable post

    Illustration:
    Kotwar often resides near the village outskirts for monitoring movements.


    5. POWERS OF KOTWAR

    Although limited, his powers are practically significant:

    1. Power to Maintain Law & Order Support

    • Prevents disturbances

    • Informs police/Patwari immediately

    • Assists police during patrols or investigations

    2. Power to Protect Government Land

    • Watch and ward of public land

    • Reports encroachments

    • Helps removal squads

    • Prevents illegal cutting of trees

    3. Power to Assist in Revenue Process

    • Supports Tehsildar in measurement

    • Helps survey teams with village knowledge

    • Identifies boundaries, roads, and community lands

    4. Power to Serve Notices

    • Delivers summons from revenue courts

    • Communicates government orders to villagers

    5. Power to Report Offences

    Acts as primary informer (mukhbir) for:

    • illegal liquor

    • forest offences

    • theft of crops

    • assault or suspicious movement


    6. DUTIES OF KOTWAR (Highly Expanded)

    1. Watch and Ward Duties

    • Patrol the village periphery

    • Guard ripening crops

    • Monitor water tanks, wells, and forests

    • Prevent trespass on government land

    • Report fires and thefts

    2. Revenue Duties

    • Provide information on crop conditions

    • Assist in demarcation

    • Accompany Patwari for surveys

    • Help in recovery of land revenue

    • Report unrecorded cultivation or crop change

    3. Information Duties

    Kotwar must report:

    • births & deaths

    • new constructions

    • floods, storms, fires

    • movement of unknown persons

    • cattle epidemics

    • destruction of crops

    • illicit tree cutting

    4. Assistance to Police

    • Inform about crimes

    • Accompany police to scenes

    • Identify accused or witnesses

    • Maintain village chaukis

    5. Judicial/Administrative Support

    • Serve court summons

    • Help in elections

    • Assist in census

    • Support disaster relief teams


    7. SERVICE LAND (SEWA BHUMI) OF KOTWAR

    Kotwar may hold service land, which is:

    • not transferable

    • given only for duration of service

    • cancelled on removal or retirement

    • reverts automatically to State

    Illustration:
    When a Kotwar is dismissed, his service land is resumed by Collector and reallocated.


    8. LIABILITIES AND DISCIPLINARY ACTION

    Kotwar can be punished for:

    1. Failure to report encroachments

    2. Collusion with criminals

    3. Not reporting natural calamities

    4. Aiding illegal land transfers

    5. Falsifying information

    6. Failure to cooperate with police

    7. Absence from duty

    Penalties include:

    • suspension,

    • removal,

    • cancellation of service land,

    • criminal prosecution in serious cases.


    9. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


    1. Pukaram Kotwar v. Collector, Mandla (MBLR)

    Facts (8–10 lines)

    Pukaram, a Kotwar for 20 years, repeatedly ignored villagers’ complaints about nighttime thefts. Investigation showed he had personal relations with suspected offenders and failed to report activities. Collector removed him. Appeal argued removal harsh for minor lapse.

    Judgment

    Court upheld dismissal, stressing Kotwar’s essential law-and-order role.

    Significance

    Kotwar must be vigilant; dereliction cannot be tolerated.


    2. Bhuribai v. State of M.P., MPHC

    Facts

    Kotwar suppressed information about illegal encroachment by local influential person. Inquiry found deliberate collusion.

    Judgment

    High Court upheld termination and cancellation of service land.

    Significance

    Kotwar is accountable for protection of public land.


    3. State v. Rajaram Kotwar, MPHC

    Facts

    Rajaram failed to report infant death and attempted cover-up. Authorities charged him with negligence.

    Judgment

    Court held that Kotwar must report births/deaths immediately.

    Significance

    Timely reporting is essential for public health and statistics.


    10. ILLUSTRATIONS

    1. Encroachment Example

    Kotwar sees new fencing on grazing land → informs Patwari → Tehsildar stops encroachment.

    2. Crime Example

    Kotwar notices unknown individuals in forest area → alerts police → illegal hunting prevented.

    3. Calamity Example

    Kotwar reports breach in canal → irrigation department prevents flooding.


    11. CONCLUSION

    The Kotwar remains a cornerstone of grassroots governance in Madhya Pradesh. His vigilance protects government land, assists revenue officers, maintains security, and ensures rapid reporting of critical events. Despite modest statutory power, his functional role is pivotal for effective rural administration.


Unit – V Rights in Abadi and unoccupied Land

  1. Gram Sabha.

Gram Sabha (under MP Panchayat Raj & Revenue Framework)

(20-mark structure: introduction → meaning → statutory basis → composition → powers → functions → land-related duties → case laws → illustrations → conclusion)


1. INTRODUCTION

The Gram Sabha is the foundational democratic institution at the village level, functioning as the collective assembly of all adult residents in a Gram Panchayat area. Under the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj system, the Gram Sabha is empowered to exercise direct control over community resources, social justice, transparency, land management, and welfare schemes.

Although the Gram Sabha is governed mainly by the M.P. Panchayat Raj and Gram Swaraj Act, 1993, its decisions deeply intersect with land administration, forest rights, nistar rights, and local revenue functions, making it indirectly relevant under the MP Land Revenue Code.

Illustration:
If villagers want to prevent illegal encroachment on community grazing land (charnoi), the first institution to pass a resolution is the Gram Sabha.


2. STATUTORY BASIS

  • Article 243A, Constitution of India – legal status to Gram Sabha

  • MP Panchayat Raj and Gram Swaraj Act, 1993 – primary governing legislation

  • Forest Rights Act, 2006 – village-level forest rights committees under Gram Sabha

  • MP Land Revenue Code (indirectly) – nistar land use, rights over commons, etc.


3. MEANING OF GRAM SABHA

Gram Sabha means:

“A body consisting of persons registered in the electoral rolls relating to a village within the jurisdiction of a Gram Panchayat.”

This includes all adults of the village.

It is the only institution where direct democracy is practiced.


4. COMPOSITION

  • All registered voters in the village

  • Includes men, women, SC/ST members, OBCs, etc.

  • Headed by: Sarpanch

  • Secretary: Gram Panchayat Secretary

Meetings must be held at least four times a year.


5. POWERS OF GRAM SABHA (Expanded)

1. Control over local resources

  • Grazing land

  • Nistar land

  • Village forests

  • Water bodies (tanks, ponds)

2. Oversight of Panchayat functioning

  • Approval of annual budget

  • Approval of development plans

  • Monitoring of works under MNREGA

3. Social Justice Powers

  • Selection of beneficiaries for government schemes

  • Issuing certificates (residence, caste, income)

  • Monitoring of ration shops, anganwadis

4. Land-Related Powers

  • Preventing encroachment on community land

  • Identifying village boundaries

  • Supervising use of nistar resources

  • Passing objections regarding allotment of government land

  • Supporting forest rights claims under FRA 2006

5. Forest & Environment Powers

  • Management of minor forest produce

  • Regulation of forest access

  • Protection of village commons

  • Reporting illegal cutting, mining


6. FUNCTIONS OF GRAM SABHA

  1. Prepare and approve village development plan

  2. Approve Gram Panchayat accounts

  3. Social audit of development works

  4. Identify beneficiaries for housing/welfare schemes

  5. Maintain transparency through public readings of records

  6. Monitor schools, healthcare centers, anganwadis

  7. Enforce prohibition and regulate liquor shops

  8. Environmental conservation and waste management


7. ROLE IN LAND & REVENUE ADMINISTRATION

Even though Gram Sabha is not a “revenue authority,” it plays a major supporting role:

  • Reports encroachments to Patwari/Tehsildar

  • Verifies actual possession during land disputes

  • Certifies nistar usage

  • Participates in demarcation processes

  • Protects government land

  • Helps maintain village boundary maps

  • Conducts awareness against illegal land transfers

Illustration:
If someone builds a hut on grazing land, Gram Sabha can pass a resolution demanding removal, which Tehsildar considers seriously.


8. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Orissa Mining Corporation v. Ministry of Environment (SC)

Facts (8–10 lines)

Village Gram Sabhas in Niyamgiri passed resolutions refusing diversion of forest land for mining. The issue was whether Gram Sabha approval is mandatory for forest land use change.

Judgment

Supreme Court held that Gram Sabhas are competent to decide religious, cultural, and forest rights.

Significance

Recognizes Gram Sabha authority over forest and community land.


2. Union of India v. State of MP (FRA context)

Facts

Dispute arose whether Gram Sabha can certify forest-dweller rights.

Judgment

Court upheld Gram Sabha’s central role in forest rights verification.

Significance

Shows Gram Sabha’s importance in land rights administration.


3. State of MP v. Kashiram (MPHC)

Facts

Gram Sabha passed resolution preventing allotment of nistar land for private use. Collector ignored it.

Judgment

High Court said Gram Sabha resolution must be considered before allotment.

Significance

Authorities must respect Gram Sabha decisions.


9. ILLUSTRATIONS

1. Encroachment Case

Gram Sabha identifies encroachment on charnoi land → informs Patwari → eviction under Sec. 250 MP LRC.

2. Forest Rights Case

Villagers collect evidence of long-standing forest use → Gram Sabha certifies → FRA committee authorises rights.

3. Development Planning

Gram Sabha approves site for school building → Panchayat executes.


10. CONCLUSION

The Gram Sabha is the backbone of local self-governance. It empowers villagers to control local resources, monitor land use, protect nistar and forest rights, and ensure transparent administration. Its resolutions hold legal and moral authority, making it vital to rural governance in Madhya Pradesh.

  1. Wajib-ul-arz.

1. INTRODUCTION

Wajib-ul-arz is an important historical and administrative document prepared during settlement operations in Indian villages. It forms part of the record-of-rights and contains a written record of customs, rights, liabilities, and usages prevailing in the village community. Although its significance has reduced after the modern MP Land Revenue Code, 1959, it still serves as a valuable reference in land disputes, nistar rights, tenancy customs, and village-level rights.

Illustration:
If villagers used to collect fuel wood or grazing rights from a particular forest patch and such usage is recorded in the Wajib-ul-arz, that entry becomes crucial evidence in deciding their rights.


2. MEANING OF WAJIB-UL-ARZ

Wajib-ul-arz means:

“A written statement or register of village customs, rights, liabilities and administrative arrangements prepared during land settlement.”

It records customary laws and village practices relating to:

  • water

  • grazing

  • forest usage

  • revenue collection

  • easements

  • communal rights

  • tenancy and cultivation practices.


3. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

  • Originated in Mughal times → regularised under British settlement policy.

  • Prepared during revenue settlement for each village.

  • Served as a contract between the State and the village community.

  • After independence, it continued as a reference document for customary rights.

In Madhya Pradesh, old Wajib-ul-arz documents from Central Provinces and Berar are still used in disputes.


4. STATUTORY BASIS

Although MP Land Revenue Code, 1959 does not directly require preparation of Wajib-ul-arz today, its legal effect flows through:

  • Sections 104–115 MP LRC → record-of-rights, khasra, village customs

  • Section 57 MP LRC → recognition of existing rights

  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872 → entries in public records as evidence

  • Old Settlement Manuals of CP & Berar → still recognised historically

Courts treat Wajib-ul-arz as a public document.


5. CONTENTS OF WAJIB-UL-ARZ

Wajib-ul-arz typically contains:

1. Village Customs & Usage

  • Nistar rules

  • Forest produce rights

  • Grazing customs

  • Irrigation customs

  • Rights of access to tanks or wells

2. Community Rights

  • Rights of potters, blacksmiths

  • Rights of landless persons

  • Rights of tribal groups

  • Rights of fishermen

3. Land Revenue Arrangements

  • Distribution of assessment

  • Duties of Patel/Kotwar

  • Boundaries of village

4. Tenancy & Agricultural Practices

  • Crop-sharing customs

  • Right of tenants to fodder

  • Harvesting practices

5. Miscellaneous Matters

  • Public paths

  • Village ponds

  • Customary easements

  • Restrictions on tree cutting


6. PURPOSE OF WAJIB-UL-ARZ

  1. To record village customs systematically

  2. To prevent future disputes

  3. To define rights of villagers in forests, grazing fields, and water

  4. To guide revenue officials in enforcing customary practices

  5. To serve as documentary proof in court

  6. To serve as foundation for nistar rules

  7. To preserve traditional usages


7. LEGAL VALUE

Even though it is an old document, Wajib-ul-arz holds substantial legal value:

  • Treated as record-of-rights

  • Recognised by courts for deciding customary rights

  • Used in disputes relating to forest, water, nistar, and easements

  • Binding on villagers unless modified by law

Courts hold it as presumptive evidence of village customs.


8. EVIDENTIARY VALUE (Indian Evidence Act)

Under Sections 35, 74 & 114 of the Evidence Act:

  • Wajib-ul-arz is a public document

  • Entries are relevant facts

  • Presumed genuine unless proven otherwise

  • Accepted unless contradicted by newer laws

Illustration:
Wajib-ul-arz stating that “villagers may cut grass from Nistar land in monsoon” strongly supports villagers’ customary rights.


9. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Durga Prasad v. State of MP, MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines)

Villagers claimed customary right to use a pond for fishing. Government contractor disputed this, stating no records exist. Wajib-ul-arz of 1913 contained entry showing free fishing rights for villagers. Government argued document outdated.

Judgment

High Court held that Wajib-ul-arz, being an official settlement record, has strong evidentiary value unless repealed.

Significance

Supports customary village rights.


2. Mangilal v. Board of Revenue, MBLR

Facts

Dispute over grazing rights. Opponent claimed exclusive rights. Wajib-ul-arz showed grazing as common right.

Judgment

Board held grazing rights were communal.

Significance

Wajib-ul-arz determines nature of nistar rights.


3. Barkat Ali v. State of MP, MPHC

Facts

Issue of easement right over path leading to fields. Wajib-ul-arz recorded public path.

Judgment

Court upheld right-of-way based on Wajib-ul-arz.

Significance

Recognizes evidentiary value of old records.


10. ILLUSTRATIONS

1. Nistar Example

Wajib-ul-arz shows right to collect minor forest produce → villagers entitled.

2. Easement Example

Public pathway entry → landowner cannot block it.

3. Grazing Example

Entry says cattle may graze on charnoi → prevents privatization.


11. CONCLUSION

Wajib-ul-arz is an important historical document that records the customary rights and obligations of village communities. Despite its antiquity, it holds continuing relevance, particularly in disputes over forest rights, nistar land, grazing, and easements. Courts and revenue authorities treat it as persuasive evidence of long-standing village customs that govern land use and communal behaviour.

  1. Nistar Patrak.

Nistar Patrak (Village Nistar Register)

(20-mark format: introduction → meaning → statutory basis → contents → purpose → legal significance → relation with forest & revenue law → case laws → illustrations → conclusion)


1. INTRODUCTION

Nistar Patrak is one of the most important documents for rural land management in Madhya Pradesh. It codifies the customary and statutory rights of villagers over community resources, especially:

  • grazing lands (charnoi),

  • forest produce,

  • water bodies,

  • fuel wood collection,

  • fishing rights,

  • access to village commons.

It functions as the village-level “resource management charter,” guiding both villagers and revenue authorities in regulating the use of communal assets. Nistar Patrak also prevents exploitation of common lands and ensures equitable distribution of benefits.

Illustration:
If villagers are allowed to collect firewood only from a specific patch of forest, the Nistar Patrak records that right and governs who can benefit and how much they can collect.


2. MEANING OF NISTAR PATRAK

Nistar Patrak means:

“A formally prepared register or record containing the customs, rules, and rights of villagers relating to nistar (use of village commons and forest resources).”

It outlines the manner, extent, and conditions under which village residents may access community resources.


3. STATUTORY BASIS

Nistar Patrak draws legal authority from:

1. MP Land Revenue Code, 1959

  • Section 237–239 (Nistar Rights)

  • Section 240–246 (Village Forests & Nistar Management)

2. Forest Rights Act, 2006

Recognises community forest rights through Gram Sabha and forest rights committees.

3. Settlement Manuals & Old Administrative Practice

Nistar Patraks were prepared during settlement operations and remain in use.

4. Village Forest Rules


4. CONTENTS OF NISTAR PATRAK

It includes complete details of:

1. Nistar Lands

  • grazing land (charnoi)

  • fodder reserves

  • forest patches reserved for villagers

  • riverbank and tank use

  • village commons

2. Rights of Villagers

  • grazing of cattle

  • collection of fuel wood

  • collection of minor forest produce

  • rights of fishermen in tanks

  • rights of potters to clay

  • rights of cattle owners to drinking water

  • rights of woodcutters or tribal groups

3. Restrictions

  • limits on grass cutting

  • seasonal restrictions

  • designated grazing routes

  • prohibition on commercial extraction

  • restrictions on outsiders

4. Duties & Penalties

  • fines for misuse

  • penalties for illicit cutting

  • obligations to protect forest areas

  • duties of Patel, Kotwar, and Patwari


5. PURPOSE OF NISTAR PATRAK

1. To regulate use of community resources

Ensures sustainable use.

2. To protect village commons from encroachment and misuse

Prevents private appropriation.

3. To protect traditional rights of weaker groups

Ensures fair access.

4. To assist revenue and forest officers in planning

Used during demarcation and forest boundary disputes.

5. To resolve disputes using written records

Reduces conflict.


6. LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE

1. Presumptive Evidence of Rights

Courts treat Nistar Patrak as strong evidence.

2. Binding on Villagers

Unless modified by law.

3. Used by Revenue Courts

During:

  • eviction proceedings,

  • encroachment detection,

  • nistar disputes.

4. Integral to Forest Rights

Used alongside Gram Sabha resolutions under FRA 2006.

5. Prevents Illegal Diversion of Commons

Officials must consult Nistar Patrak before diverting grazing land.


7. RELATION TO FOREST & EASEMENT RIGHTS

  • Village residents may have easement-like rights under Nistar Patrak.

  • Many entries relate to collection of forest produce.

  • Acts as documentary foundation for community forest rights.

  • Helps establish customary easements like right-of-way, right-of-collecting water or fuel wood.

Illustration:
Right-of-way to reach a pond for watering cattle is recorded in Nistar Patrak → treated as customary easement.


8. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Shyamlal v. State of MP, MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines)

Villagers claimed exclusive right to use a tank for fishing. Nistar Patrak showed the tank as “gram samudayik jalashay” (community tank). Forest department tried to auction fishing rights. Villagers filed a petition arguing violation of their nistar rights.

Judgment

High Court held that Nistar Patrak entries have presumptive validity and villagers' rights cannot be ignored.

Significance

Community resources protected from commercial exploitation.


2. Rajaram v. Collector, Chhindwara (MBLR)

Facts

Grazing land reduced for allotment to a private company. Nistar Patrak showed land reserved for cattle grazing.

Judgment

Court ruled that diversion of nistar land requires special justification and cannot violate villagers’ rights.

Significance

Nistar Patrak limits executive discretion.


3. Mahua Bai v. State, MPHC

Facts

Women claimed right to collect minor forest produce like tendu leaves. Nistar Patrak confirmed this.

Judgment

Court upheld women’s collection rights.

Significance

Strengthens community forest usage rights.


9. ILLUSTRATIONS

1. Grazing Example

Cattle owners allowed 10 hours daily access → reflected in Nistar Patrak → protected legally.

2. Firewood Example

Villagers allowed to collect dry twigs from specific area → prevents punishment for legal activity.

3. Water Use Example

Pond entry states “common use for drinking and washing” → prevents privatization.


10. CONCLUSION

Nistar Patrak is the village’s authoritative record governing the use of its natural resources. It protects community rights, prevents illegal exploitation, resolves disputes, and assists administrative authorities in managing village commons. Its importance remains fundamental in rural governance and land rights administration.

  1. Rights in forest Easement.

1. INTRODUCTION

Easement rights connected with forests — such as rights of way, grazing, water, pasture, fuel wood, and minor forest produce — have existed in Indian villages for centuries. These rights are vital for rural survival, especially for tribal and forest-dwelling communities.
Forest easements ensure that local inhabitants may continue to enjoy certain customary, beneficial, and livelihood-based access rights over forest land even though the legal ownership of forests generally vests in the State.

These rights emerge from a combination of:

  • custom,

  • long usage,

  • statutory recognition,

  • Gram Sabha certification, and

  • forest settlement operations.


2. MEANING OF FOREST EASEMENT

A forest easement means:

“A right possessed by a person or community over forest land belonging to another (usually the State), enabling them to use it for specific purposes such as passage, grazing, fuel wood, and minor produce collection.”

It is not ownership, but a restricted, beneficial use right.


3. STATUTORY BASIS

Forest easement rights derive from:

1. Indian Easements Act, 1882

  • Defines easements (Sections 4–7).

  • Recognises “customary easements” (Sec. 18).

2. Indian Forest Act, 1927 (IFA)

  • Sections 4–20: Forest settlement process

  • Rights of villagers dealt with during declaration of Reserved Forests.

3. Forest Rights Act, 2006

  • Strongest recognition of community forest rights.

  • Overrules older forest laws regarding livelihood rights.

4. MP Land Revenue Code

  • Nistar rights (Sec. 237–246).

  • Entry of rights in Nistar Patrak.

  • Support to community grazing and forest usage.

5. MP Village Forest Rules

  • Allow forest rights to be exercised under supervision.


4. TYPES OF FOREST EASEMENTS

1. Rights of Pasturage

  • Grazing cattle in forest areas.

  • Use of specific grazing routes.

2. Rights to Forest Produce

  • Dry wood

  • Grass

  • Leaves

  • Bamboo

  • Edible fruits

  • Tendu leaves (minor forest produce)

  • Honey, gum, resin (under FRA)

3. Rights of Way / Passage

  • Paths through forest to reach agricultural land.

  • Access to water bodies.

  • Access to settlement areas.

4. Rights of Water

  • Watering cattle at forest streams.

  • Using forest ponds for domestic purpose.

5. Rights of Access for Cultivation

  • Used especially by Scheduled Tribes & forest dwellers

  • Recognised more broadly under Forest Rights Act.

6. Ritual / Cultural Rights

  • Visiting sacred groves

  • Collecting leaves/flowers for rituals

  • Worshipping deities inside forests


5. HOW FOREST EASEMENTS ARE ACQUIRED

1. By Custom / Long Usage

Under Section 18 of Easements Act:
If villagers use a forest path or collect wood for decades, easement becomes customary.

2. By Grant

Forest department may allow grazing or fuel collection by permit.

3. By Statutory Recognition

  • Nistar rights under MP LRC

  • Forest Rights Act, 2006

  • Revenue settlement records (Wajib-ul-arz, Nistar Patrak)

4. During Forest Settlement

If villagers claim rights during reservation proceedings (IFA 1927), Settlement Officer records or compensates them.

5. By Prescriptive Easement (Sec. 15 of Easements Act)

Long continuous use for 20 years.


6. RESTRICTIONS / LIMITATIONS ON FOREST EASEMENTS

Forest easements are not absolute:

  • Cannot be used for commercial exploitation.

  • Subject to forest conservation rules.

  • Limitations imposed for wildlife preservation.

  • Cannot be expanded beyond traditional use.

  • Rights may be suspended temporarily due to fire season.

  • Grazing restricted to permit areas.


7. EXTINGUISHMENT OF FOREST EASEMENTS

A forest easement may end by:

  1. Non-use for a long period (20 years).

  2. Permanent change in forest land (e.g., submergence under dam).

  3. Voluntary release.

  4. Incompatibility with statutory forest reservation.

  5. Extinguishment under FRA once community rights are redefined.


8. RELATION WITH MP LAND REVENUE CODE

Although forests fall under forest laws, the MP LRC interacts through:

  • Nistar rights (Sec. 237–246) → villagers’ rights to forest produce.

  • Nistar Patrak & Wajib-ul-arz → documentary evidence.

  • Gram Sabha powers under FRA → community certification.

  • Boundary & demarcation → revenue authorities maintain maps.

Easement rights often appear during land disputes or encroachments.


9. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Banwasi Seva Ashram v. State of UP (SC)

Facts (8–10 lines)

Forest dwellers claimed rights of fuel wood and grazing in areas proposed to be declared as Reserved Forest. State argued forest rights extinguished automatically. Petitioners produced documentary evidence including old settlement records showing long-standing usage.

Judgment

Supreme Court held that customary forest rights must be considered during forest reservation process.

Significance

Strengthens recognition of forest easements.


2. Orissa Mining Corporation v. Ministry of Environment (SC)

Facts

Tribal communities objected to diversion of forest land for mining. Their cultural and access rights were considered forest easements tied to religious freedom.

Judgment

SC upheld the Gram Sabha’s authority to protect forest rights.

Significance

Shows easement rights can be cultural and religious.


3. State of MP v. Kashiram, MPHC

Facts

Villager used forest path to reach fields. Forest department fenced area blocking access.

Judgment

Court held right-of-way over forest path is customary easement unless prohibited by law.

Significance

Customary easements prevail over administrative inconvenience.


10. ILLUSTRATIONS

1. Grazing Example

Villagers graze cattle in forest clearing for decades → becomes customary easement.

2. Pathway Example

Only road to fields passes through forest → right-of-way easement exists.

3. Fuelwood Example

Collecting dry twigs every winter → recognised as nistar & easement.


11. CONCLUSION

Forest easement rights are a vital part of rural and tribal life, enabling communities to access forests for grazing, movement, fuel, minor produce and cultural activities. These rights originate from custom, long usage, statutory recognition, and forest settlement processes. Both forest laws and MP LRC reinforce these rights, ensuring a balanced approach between conservation and livelihood needs.

  1. Exclusive Jurisdiction of Revenue Courts.

1. INTRODUCTION

The Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC) establishes a separate hierarchy of revenue courts to decide disputes related to land records, land revenue, tenancy, mutation, demarcation, and other land administration matters.
Certain matters are placed exclusively within the jurisdiction of revenue courts and cannot be heard by civil courts.

This principle reflects the need for specialization, uniformity, and expeditious disposal of revenue-related disputes.

Illustration:
If two farmers dispute the boundary between their fields, the Tehsildar or SDO — not the civil court — has exclusive jurisdiction to demarcate the boundary under MP LRC.


2. STATUTORY BASIS

Exclusive jurisdiction arises from:

1. Section 257 — Exclusive Jurisdiction of Revenue Courts

Bars civil courts from hearing matters assigned to revenue authorities.

2. Section 257-B

Revenue Courts' jurisdiction extends to all disputes expressly provided under MP LRC.

3. Schedules & Rules

Contain lists of matters triable only by revenue officers.

4. Sections 110–135

Demarcation, survey & boundary issues → exclusive to revenue machinery.

5. Section 178

Partition of holdings → revenue courts only.

6. Section 109

Correction of land records → exclusive domain.


3. MEANING OF “EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION”

Exclusive jurisdiction means:

Only revenue courts/officers (Tehsildar, SDO, Collector, Commissioner, Board of Revenue) have the authority to decide specific disputes.

Civil courts are completely barred from dealing with such matters.

This creates a complete and effective revenue judiciary separate from civil courts.


4. REVENUE COURTS UNDER MP LRC

The following authorities function as revenue courts:

  1. Tehsildar & Naib Tehsildar

  2. Sub-Divisional Officer (SDO)

  3. Collector

  4. Commissioner

  5. Board of Revenue

Each authority exercises judicial powers depending on the nature of the dispute.


5. MATTERS EXCLUSIVELY TRIABLE BY REVENUE COURTS

1. Demarcation of Land — Sec. 129–134

Boundary disputes, placement of boundary marks.

2. Partition of Holdings — Sec. 178

Division of agricultural land among co-sharers.

3. Mutation & Inheritance Entries — Sec. 109

Corrections, entries, and updating of land records.

4. Tenancy Matters (Occupancy Tenant Rights)

Eviction, restoration, rent disputes.

5. Bhumiswami & Bhumidhari Rights

Recognition/cancellation under Sec. 158.

6. Nistar Rights

Use of community land and forest produce.

7. Diversion of Land — Sec. 172–175

Change of land use from agriculture to non-agriculture.

8. Encroachment & Eviction — Sec. 248 & 250

Removal of illegal occupiers on government land.

9. Re-assessment & Survey

Revenue assessments and survey corrections.

10. Government Leases

Grant, renewal, and cancellation.

11. Allotment of government land

Decided only by revenue authorities.

12. Forfeiture of land

Under breach of lease or tribal land restrictions.


6. WHY CIVIL COURTS ARE BARRED? (RATIONALE)

  1. Specialization – Revenue courts understand land measurement, khasra, maps.

  2. Faster disposal – Civil courts are heavily burdened.

  3. Revenue administration requires expertise – Technical decisions need trained officers.

  4. Uniformity – Ensures standardised land record corrections.

  5. Avoids conflicting decisions – Civil and revenue courts may otherwise conflict.


7. SCOPE OF CIVIL COURT JURISDICTION (WHEN NOT BARRED)

Civil courts retain jurisdiction in:

1. Questions of Title

Civil courts decide ownership if dispute is complex.

2. Cases involving fraud

Revenue courts cannot decide serious fraud allegations.

3. Partition of property other than agricultural land

Like house, shops, abadi land.

4. Civil rights violations

Easements, contracts, torts.

Illustration:

If dispute relates to whether a will transferring land is forged, civil court decides title; revenue court enters mutation based on final civil decree.


8. LIMITATIONS ON REVENUE COURTS

  1. Cannot decide title disputes finally.

  2. Cannot grant declaratory decrees like civil courts.

  3. Cannot adjudicate boundaries in urban property beyond agricultural limits.

  4. Cannot decide cases involving compensation under acquisition acts.

  5. Cannot override civil court decrees.


9. IMPORTANT CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Abdul Razak v. State of MP, MPHC

Facts (8–10 lines)

Abdul Razak filed suit in civil court seeking correction of revenue entries. Defendant raised objection that matter is exclusively triable by revenue courts under Section 109. Civil court initially entertained suit but later referred issue to High Court.

Judgment

High Court held civil court has no jurisdiction over mutation entries; exclusive domain of revenue authorities.

Significance

Reaffirms bar of civil courts in revenue record matters.


2. Jagdish v. Board of Revenue, MBLR

Facts

Parties disputed boundary between agricultural fields. Civil court passed temporary injunction. Opponent challenged jurisdiction.

Judgment

High Court held boundary disputes fall exclusively within revenue courts under Sec. 129–134.

Significance

Boundary disputes = revenue matter.


3. Smt. Laxmibai v. State, MPHC

Facts

Widow sought declaration of title over agricultural land along with mutation. Revenue court refused to decide title. She approached civil court.

Judgment

Civil court had jurisdiction because issue of title was central.

Significance

Revenue courts cannot decide intricate title issues.


10. ILLUSTRATIONS

1. Mutation Example

Ram seeks mutation → revenue court decides; civil court barred.

2. Demarcation Example

Boundary line between two farms → revenue court exclusively.

3. Title Example

Heirs dispute validity of will → civil court decides; revenue court waits for outcome.


11. CONCLUSION

The MP Land Revenue Code creates a specialised system of revenue courts with exclusive jurisdiction over land administration matters such as mutation, demarcation, partition, diversion, and tenancy. Civil courts remain barred from these areas to ensure efficiency, uniformity, and expertise. Yet civil courts retain authority over title disputes, fraud, and civil rights. Understanding the division of jurisdiction is essential for proper litigation strategy in land matters.

  1. Miscellaneous Provisions.

1. INTRODUCTION

The Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (MP LRC) is an exhaustive legislation regulating land rights, land revenue, village commons, surveys, demarcation, tenancy, and administration.
Apart from core chapters dealing with substantive land rights, the Code contains a set of Miscellaneous Provisions mainly found in:

  • Chapter XII – Offences and Penalties

  • Chapter XIII – Miscellaneous (Sections 241–277)

  • Other connecting provisions scattered throughout the Code

These miscellaneous provisions ensure smooth functioning of the land administration system, provide powers to officers, protect government land, regulate encroachments, and supply procedural mechanisms essential for implementing the Code.


2. MEANING OF MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Miscellaneous provisions are supplementary statutory clauses that:

  • fill procedural gaps,

  • empower authorities,

  • enforce rights and obligations,

  • regulate land management,

  • protect government property,

  • prescribe penalties,

  • manage special situations such as eviction, encroachment, resumption of land, and rule-making.


3. STATUTORY BASIS (IMPORTANT CHAPTERS & SECTIONS)

The provisions come mainly from:

A. Chapter XII – Offences and Penalties (Sections 240–247)

Deals with:

  • illicit removal of forest produce

  • damage to boundary marks

  • illegal occupation

  • obstruction of revenue officers

  • penalties for violating revenue laws

B. Chapter XIII – Miscellaneous (Sections 248–277)

Key areas include:

  • Section 248 – Penalties for unauthorised occupation

  • Section 250 – Ejectment of unauthorized occupants

  • Section 251 – Recovery of damages

  • Section 257 – Bar of civil court jurisdiction

  • Section 259–263 – Service of summons/notices

  • Section 264 – Process fees

  • Section 266–270 – Village papers, record maintenance

  • Section 271–275 – Rule-making powers

  • Section 276 – Annual registers

  • Section 277 – Protection of acts done in good faith

C. Dispersed Miscellaneous Clauses

  • Section 110–135 – Boundary marks, survey & demarcation

  • Section 152–158 – Rights of Bhumiswami

  • Section 172–178 – Diversion & Partition

  • Section 237–246 – Nistar rights (partially overlaps with misc.)


4. IMPORTANT MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS (WITH SECTIONS)


1. Protection of Government Land

Government land is protected under:

  • Section 57 – State ownership

  • Section 248 – Penalty for unauthorized occupation

  • Section 250 – Summary ejectment

  • Section 251 – Recovery of damages

Authorities may:

  • impose fines,

  • demolish encroachments,

  • recover penalties as arrears of land revenue.


2. Ejectment of Unauthorized Occupants — Section 250

Tehsildar may:

  • issue notice,

  • hold inquiry,

  • order summary eviction,

  • seize crops/materials,

  • dismantle illegal construction.

Illustration:
If someone occupies charnoi land, eviction proceeds strictly under Section 250.


3. Recovery of Land Revenue — Sections 146–159 & 257(1)(j)

Miscellaneous powers enable:

  • attachment of crops (Sec. 147),

  • distress warrant,

  • sale of movable/immovable property,

  • recovery from rent or produce.


4. Power to Enter & Inspect Land — Section 230

Revenue officers may:

  • enter land,

  • inspect crops,

  • measure boundaries,

  • verify encroachments.

This section provides legal backing for administrative inspections.


5. Service of Summons & Notices — Sections 259–263

Modes include:

  • personal service,

  • through Kotwar,

  • affixation,

  • registered post,

  • public announcement.

Failure to appear after valid service results in ex-parte action.


6. Damage to Boundary Marks — Section 246

Removing, injuring, or altering boundary marks is punishable.

Boundary marks maintained under:

  • Section 129–134


7. Penalties for Offences — Sections 240–247

Covers:

  • illegal wood cutting,

  • obstruction of officers,

  • tampering with records,

  • misuse of nistar land,

  • violation of land revenue rules.


8. Rule-Making Powers — Sections 271–275

State Government can frame rules for:

  • Patwaris & Kotwars,

  • land records,

  • surveys,

  • demarcation procedure,

  • nistar land regulation,

  • revenue recovery.


9. Bar of Civil Court Jurisdiction — Section 257

Civil courts cannot entertain matters assigned exclusively to revenue courts:

  • boundary disputes,

  • mutation,

  • partition of holdings,

  • diversion of land,

  • encroachment proceedings.


10. Protection of Acting Officers — Section 277

Revenue officers are protected for acts done in good faith.


5. CASE LAWS (Medium-Verbose Facts)


1. Shivkumar v. State of MP, MPHC

Facts

Shivkumar encroached on government tank land. Tehsildar used Sec. 250 to evict him. He moved civil court claiming title dispute.

Judgment

High Court held Sec. 250 is valid summary remedy; civil court barred by Sec. 257.

Significance

Shows supremacy of revenue authorities in eviction matters.


2. Radhe Bai v. Collector, Jabalpur (MBLR)

Facts

She repeatedly removed boundary stones. Penalty imposed under Sec. 246.

Judgment

Court upheld penalty due to importance of boundary stabilization.

Significance

Boundary marks are foundational for records and land order.


3. Hariram v. State of MP, MPHC

Facts

Revenue officer entered fields without permission for demarcation. Farmer objected. Officer acted under Sec. 230.

Judgment

Court affirmed that Sec. 230 authorises administrative entry for official duties.

Significance

Supports the authority of officers executing land inspection.


6. ILLUSTRATIONS

1. Encroachment Example (Sec. 250)

A hut built on grazing land → Tehsildar ejects.

2. Service of Notice (Sec. 259)

Kotwar serves notice → ex parte action valid.

3. Boundary Stone Damage (Sec. 246)

Farmer removes boundary stone → fined.


7. CONCLUSION

Miscellaneous provisions under the MP Land Revenue Code are essential for the enforcement of the statute. They empower revenue officers, safeguard government land, streamline revenue processes, and define procedural norms like service of notice, recovery, penalties, and rule-making. Without these provisions, the Code’s substantive chapters would be incomplete and ineffective. These sections ensure administrative efficiency, protect public land, and maintain order and stability in the rural land system.




_____________________________________________________________________________

Texts & References

  1. M.P. Land Revenue Code – 1959 (Jindal) 2008 Ed.

  2. M.P. Land Revenue Code – (Amendment) Act 2019.


New Syllabus

Unit I – M.P. Land Revenue Code

  1. Objects and reasons for enacting the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959

  2. Basic features of the Code

  3. Definitions (as amended up to Act of 2019)

  4. Board of Revenue

  5. Revenue Officers: Classes and Powers

  6. Procedure of Revenue Officers and Revenue Courts


Unit II

  1. Appeal, Revision & Review

  2. Land and Land Revenue

  3. Revenue Survey & Settlement in Non-Urban Areas

  4. Assessment & Reassessment of Land in Urban Areas

  5. Land Records

  6. Boundaries, Boundary Marks, and Survey Marks

  7. Realization of Land Revenue


Unit III

  1. Tenure Holders

  2. Government Lessee & Service Land

  3. Occupancy Tenant

  4. Alluvion, Dilluvion & Service Land

  5. Consolidation of Holdings

  6. Village Officers

  7. Rights in Abadi and Unoccupied Land & its Procedures

Unit 4 MP Ceilings on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960

  1. Definitions (Section 2)
  2. Exemptions and Restrictions on Transfer of Land (Section3-5)
  3. Fixation of Ceiling Area; Determination of Surplus Land thereof (Sections 6–16)
  4. Payment of Compensation (Sections 16–21)
  5. Encumbrances on Surplus Land (Sections 22–34)
  6. Disposal of Surplus Land (Sections 35–37)
  7. Offences and Penalties (Sections 37-A to 37-B)
  8. Payment of Compensation

Unit 5 MP Accomodation Control Act, 1961

  1. Definitions
  2. Provisions Regarding Rent
  3. Control of Eviction of Tenants Grounds of Bonafide Requirement
  4. Eviction on
  5. Deposit of Rent
  6. Appointment, Powers, and Functions of Rent Controlling Authorities
  7. Appeals
  8. Special Obligations of Landlords and Penalties